Re: [Gui4j-user] Documentation mistake ?

[<ka...@we...>]

Hi Christophe,

I assume you're referring to the documentation of subcomponent "node" of 
component "tree". And I have to say you're right, the documentation is 
wrong about the return type. A List is required, a Collection is not 
sufficient. The reason for this is that the tree needs to know in what 
order to display the children of a node.

The return type info in the documentation is now fixed in CVS. It might 
take me a little while to update the reference on gui4.org, though.

Thanks for the hint.

Kay


Christophe JALADY wrote:

>Hello,
>
>On documentation page, 
>http://www.gui4j.net/gui4jdocs/index.html
>a mistake seem's occur:
>
>"children" optional attribute is specified as 
>"return type: java.util.Collection"
>
>But in commentary, it's explained  that the type must be
>"java.util.List".
>
>Who's wrong ?? 
>(according to my test, I suppose that the type required is "List", but
>why collection isn't sufficient ?)
>
>
>Thank's to Gui4J Team for his work on this project.
>
>Christophe JALADY.
>
>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
>for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
>searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
>_______________________________________________
>Gui4j-user mailing list
>Gui...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gui4j-user
>  
>