From: <tin...@gm...> - 2013-10-28 11:26:03
|
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 16:37:38 -0200, Henrique Cesar Ulbrich wrote: > I guess I failed to explain. Language barrier, you know. English is not one > of my strongest skills. Let's try again: > > Of course, it's not supported. But there must be a reason for not being > supported. For iOS 4 and up a new version of libgpod would have to be > written to make use of some kind of binary blob from Apple. My question is: > > 1. Did someone research or document those things? How deep did he/she go in > the matter? Is this documentation, if exists, archived somewhere? > > 2. If not, did this at least been discussed in the mailing lists? Did > someone find something that could be a starting point? I guess frequent changes in new iOS versions that would break libgpod are not a strong motivation to work on this. Apple sending lawyers to people who participate in reverse engineering the iTunesDB certainly doesn't help either. Regards, Tino |