From: Marco T. G. e S. <marcot@r. net> - 2008-06-28 14:04:27
|
Hello, I'm working at a Debian package for gtk2hs 0.9.13, and I noticed that in the package for 0.9.12.1 there is: # Is this part useful? I doubt that these CFLAGS are used - please remove if certain CFLAGS := -Wall -g ifneq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) CFLAGS += -O0 else CFLAGS += -O2 endif Are these CFLAGS used in the build? Thanks. -- Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva Página: http://marcotmarcot.googlepages.com/ Blog: http://marcotmarcot.wordpress.com/ Correio: ma...@ri... XMPP: ma...@ja... IRC: ma...@ir... Telefone: 25151920 Celular: 98116720 Endereço: Rua Turfa, 639/701 Prado 30410-370 Belo Horizonte/MG Brasil |
From: Duncan C. <dun...@wo...> - 2008-06-28 14:24:12
|
On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 11:05 -0300, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working at a Debian package for gtk2hs 0.9.13, and I noticed that in > the package for 0.9.12.1 there is: > > # Is this part useful? I doubt that these CFLAGS are used - please > remove if certain > CFLAGS := -Wall -g > ifneq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) > CFLAGS += -O0 > else > CFLAGS += -O2 > endif > > Are these CFLAGS used in the build? Not so far as I know. And if they were the above flags would not be of any use. GHC uses sensible flags when it calls gcc. Duncan |
From: Axel S. <Axe...@en...> - 2008-06-29 20:44:17
|
On Jun 28, 2008, at 16:29, Duncan Coutts wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 11:05 -0300, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm working at a Debian package for gtk2hs 0.9.13, and I noticed >> that in >> the package for 0.9.12.1 there is: >> >> # Is this part useful? I doubt that these CFLAGS are used - please >> remove if certain >> CFLAGS := -Wall -g >> ifneq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) >> CFLAGS += -O0 >> else >> CFLAGS += -O2 >> endif >> >> Are these CFLAGS used in the build? > > Not so far as I know. And if they were the above flags would not be of > any use. GHC uses sensible flags when it calls gcc. > Well, they are used in the few C files that we've written as part of Gtk2Hs, right? So it's good to have -Wall in there. Axel. |
From: <seb...@gm...> - 2009-01-15 13:11:38
|
Hi friends! I was thinking about the possibility of building gtk2hs against xulrunner-1.9 for gtkmozembed support and stop using the previous (1.8). Is it possible? how can it be done? Regards... |
From: Axel S. <Axe...@en...> - 2009-01-15 15:41:12
|
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 08:36 -0430, seb...@gm... wrote: > Hi friends! > > I was thinking about the possibility of building gtk2hs against > xulrunner-1.9 for gtkmozembed support and stop using the previous (1.8). > Is it possible? how can it be done? I don't know too much about the whole xulrunner thing and as far as I can see the only thing Gtk2Hs provides is opening a webpage. Have you tried and failed to build against a newer version of libxul? (I think xulrunner is a bit of a misnomer in our configure scripts since that seems to be an interpreter for XUL files which uses libxul itself.) Axel |