From: Jens P. <ju...@co...> - 2011-09-20 15:32:48
|
Thanks for the 0.12.1 packages releases. :-) > http://code.haskell.org/~duncan/gtk2hs/gtk2hs-buildtools-0.12.1.tar.gz Since the 0.12.1 packages require gtk2hs-buildtools-0.12.1 to build I want to update the Fedora gtk2hs-buildtools packages to 0.12.1 to help people that need to cabal install gtk2hs 0.12.1. Is it a safe assumption that gtk2hs 0.11.2 also builds ok with gtk2hs-buildtools-0.12.1 or are there any concerns there? If ok, then I will also update gtk2hs-buildtools for the older Fedora 14 release (I already prepared updates for 15 and 16). Thanks, Jens |
From: Axel S. <Axe...@in...> - 2011-09-23 05:46:02
|
Yes, I think there is no breakage using the newer buildtools. Changes there are not release specific. Axel On 20 sept. 2011, at 17:32, Jens Petersen <ju...@co...> wrote: > Thanks for the 0.12.1 packages releases. :-) > >> http://code.haskell.org/~duncan/gtk2hs/gtk2hs-buildtools-0.12.1.tar.gz > > Since the 0.12.1 packages require gtk2hs-buildtools-0.12.1 to build > I want to update the Fedora gtk2hs-buildtools packages to 0.12.1 > to help people that need to cabal install gtk2hs 0.12.1. > > Is it a safe assumption that gtk2hs 0.11.2 also builds ok with > gtk2hs-buildtools-0.12.1 or are there any concerns there? > If ok, then I will also update gtk2hs-buildtools for the older > Fedora 14 release (I already prepared updates for 15 and 16). > > Thanks, Jens > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 > _______________________________________________ > Gtk2hs-users mailing list > Gtk...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk2hs-users |