Re: [Gtk2forpascal-devel] central configuration file

[Olaf L. <le...@ne...>]

Hello!

In order to create the configuration include file we could use some kind
of configure script to which you pass e.g. a gdk-target. At the moment,
there are only win32, x11, linux-fb and perhaps directfb. Or this script
could try to find out which version to compile. ( call pkg-config on
linux)

///// GTK2_FOR_PASCAL config file 

// included by all units 

{$define GDK_TARGET_LINUX_FB}

{$define USE_GTK_2_4}


// end of config file

And in gtk2.pas

    {$ifdef linux}
    gtklib = '';
    {$else}
	{$ifdef GDK_TARGET_LINUX_FB}
	    gtklib = 'libgtk-linux-fb-2.0.so';
	{$else} 
 	   {$ifdef GDK_TARGET_X11}
		gtklib = 'libgtk-x11-2.0.so';
	   {$endif}
	{$endif}
    {$endif}

In gtkincludes.inc

...
{$include gtkradiomenuitem.inc}
{$include gtkscrolledwindow.inc}

{$ifdef GDK_TARGET_X11}
    {$include gtkplug.inc}
    {$include gtksocket.inc}
{$endif}

{$include gtkselection.inc}
{$include gtkseparatormenuitem.inc}
{$include gtksignal.inc}
{$include gtksizegroup.inc}
...

That's it.


Ciao,

Olaf

Am Don, den 11.03.2004 schrieb Mattias Gaertner um 23:19:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:05:15 +0100  Olaf Leidinger <le...@ne...>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hello!
> > 
> > I just linked the samples against a gtk version, which uses the
> > linux-framebuffer backend. The only things I changed where not including
> > gtksocket.inc and gtkplug.inc (undefined references: perhaps they aren't
> > supported on linux-fb?) and setting the right PKG_CONFIG_PATH (gdklib,
> > gtklib aren't set when compiling for linux). 
> > 
> > Perhaps we could add linux-fb support to the standart distribution. The
> > changes are minimal. I think of a file called config.inc or setup.inc in
> > which you can define the gdk-backend to be used. We could also define
> > the gtk version compatibility (use new gtk-2.4 widgets or not) in this
> > file .
> > This configuration file has to be included on top of every unit.
> > According to the decisions made the library names are set and some parts
> > are compiled, others not.
> 
> Right. The configuration can't be done only by IFDEFs.
> How are these include files created exactly?