From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.o. <bug...@gn...> - 2010-09-19 16:05:55
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629727 gnome-perl | Gtk2 | unspecified Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |kaf...@gm... Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Torsten Schoenfeld <kaf...@gm...> 2010-09-19 16:05:43 UTC --- I agree that (undef) for no cells is definitely very inconvenient, and your patch corrects that. (And git puts the blame on me. :-/) But I worry about backwards compatibility. Is it conceivable that someone somewhere relies on (undef) signaling "no cells"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. |