|
From: gnome-perl (bugzilla.gnome.org) <bug...@bu...> - 2009-03-03 00:25:46
|
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573493 gnome-perl | Glib | Ver: unspecified ------- Comment #3 from Kevin Ryde 2009-03-03 00:26 UTC ------- Me? Nope, it's a maze of twisty passages. The construct-only properties was something I wondered about too, but don't really need. I see the bit about how a vfunc can find its superclass came up yet again. That seems like a hydra. If the C funcs have to implicitly know their superclass it might be necessary to build a new func for each subclass at runtime. Not hard to make some asm bytes, but being thread-safe, portable, and coping with normally no-exec data segments could be painful. -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573493. |