From: Peter R. <pe...@ly...> - 2008-12-20 06:28:27
|
Den 2008-12-19 23:09 skrev Anthony Liguori: > Federico Mena Quintero wrote: >> On Wed, 2008-12-17 at 19:49 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >>> This is a non-standard encoding and I don't see why it would be >>> helpful. How does it change things from a server's perspective? >>> >> Tight encoding is also non-standard ;) >> >> I was just matching what TightVNC does. >> > > But it's at least reserved. So is last rect, -224. According to spec, tight has 7, -1 - -222, -224 - -238 and -240 - -256. I believe it once had the entire -1 - -256 range but that some encodings where moved into the official spec. If you mean that the tight project may change the meaning of the -224 encoding, I guess you are right. But in that case they may also change encoding 7. But I for one don't think they are going to break backwards compatibility. At least not on purpose. Cheers, Peter |