[Gterm-discuss] Things for me to do
Brought to you by:
theosib
From: Timothy M. <th...@ya...> - 2002-12-13 18:49:35
|
I've just actually subscribed to the list. I'd been reading on the web before, but there are things I should respond to. Joerg said: > 2. port to FreeBSD The same. Theosib, can you chance the project overview next week? ;-) Let me know whatever changes you would like to be made to the documentation, and I will make them. Also feel free to make your own mods to it; if you want me to check things, just check in to CVS what you write, and I can edit it for structure, etc. As for the overview, are you referring to the short description on the summary page or the one at gterm.sourceforge.net? Tell me what you want, and I will do it. Additionally, both of you guys are project administrators, and although I think we should all agree on changes before they are made, you are able to make them, so you don't always have to ask me. But on the other hand, I am willing to do my share of the work on the project. My attitude towards GTerm is this: Although I wrote it initially, you guys are now making the contributions, and you can have whatever influence you want. I would like to have the original credit, but by nature of being under a GNU license, it is Free Software. I claim some ownership, because I have an emotional attachment to it, but I wish to claim far less control by comparison, and I am willing to share in everything. Also, another issue is the matter of the license. I would prefer that the library remain under LGPL, but it was suggested that we put it under GPL. Well, there's the library part and there's the X terminal example part. We could put the latter under GPL. You guys let me know what you want, and we'll come to an agreement on it. Finally, I had been working on a spin-off of GTerm which was designed for an embedded terminal. I had designed the FPGA code, and I'd coded the software for a small embedded processor. Unfortunately, I was never able to get an FPGA and CPU combination that I felt was cost-effective and sufficiently capable. What I wrote is entirely in C. It's pretty far along in capability. It's been a while, but as I recall, all I had left to do was scour vt100.net to make sure I was as compliant as possible. I am interested in having you two look at it (in confidence) and extract from it any ideas you want for adding to GTerm. I reserve the right to use the original C code for a real terminal in the future. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com |