Re: [gst-devel] RTP module

[Benjamin O. <in...@pu...>]

On Tue, 20 Apr 2004, Thomas Barraco wrote:

>  --- David Schleef <ds...@sc...> a =E9crit : > On
> Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 03:04:51PM -0700, Zeeshan
> > Ali wrote:
> > > > Second to the list, this plugin should be based
> > on a
> > > > udp module in order to establish connection for
> > any
> > > > kinds of protocols.
> > >
> > >      No, the plugin MUST be independent of the
> > > transport protocol.
> >
> > Arguably, at this point in time, it doesn't matter.
> > I'd much prefer
> > to see a solution that works rather than a solution
> > that is
> > architecturally perfect, but doesn't work.
> >
> >
> And what about the udp plugin, is it fonctionnal to
> work with the future rtp plugin ?
>
If it's not good enough you'd have to make it good enough. :)

FWIW, David and me pretty much agreed that it's a stupid idea to write
seperate RTP muxer/demuxer elements instead of providing src/sink pairs,
because the RTP element requires too much information about the
connection(s) and iirc RTP is bidirectional anyway - even if you
just listen to an RTP stream you need to send stuff. GStreamer streams
are not.

But as David said: a working method is much preferred to a perfect method.

Benjamin