From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-03-28 13:49:02
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by bu...@pr.... --- shadow/101678 Thu Mar 13 15:47:23 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.26093 Fri Mar 28 08:48:58 2003 @@ -1,20 +1,20 @@ Bug#: 101678 -Product: gnome-media -Version: 2.1.x +Product: GStreamer +Version: 0.6.0 OS: other OS Details: Status: NEW Resolution: Severity: critical Priority: High -Component: Gnome-Sound-Recorder -AssignedTo: bu...@pr... +Component: gstreamer (core) +AssignedTo: gst...@bu... ReportedBy: un...@bu... -QAContact: gno...@bu... -TargetMilestone: --- +QAContact: gst...@bu... +TargetMilestone: 0.3.3 URL: Summary: "gnome-sound-recorder -r" segfaults without a filename. Package: gnome-media Severity: normal Version: 2.1.0 @@ -135,6 +135,13 @@ Thanks ------- Additional Comments From al...@as... 2002-12-20 10:21 ------- Adding keyword and changing priority + +------- Additional Comments From bu...@pr... 2003-03-28 08:48 ------- +There is no -r argument. +I think this is GStreamer aborting because there is no -r argument, +which I think it should just quit rather than abort. + +Assigning to GStreamer |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-03-31 14:57:35
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by in...@pu.... --- shadow/101678 Fri Mar 28 08:48:58 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.25358 Mon Mar 31 09:57:10 2003 @@ -142,6 +142,11 @@ ------- Additional Comments From bu...@pr... 2003-03-28 08:48 ------- There is no -r argument. I think this is GStreamer aborting because there is no -r argument, which I think it should just quit rather than abort. Assigning to GStreamer + +------- Additional Comments From in...@pu... 2003-03-31 09:57 ------- +Created an attachment (id=15338) +Here's a patch for 0.6 I cooked up without access to a compiler. Could somebody please test this? + |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-04-04 15:49:16
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by in...@pu.... --- shadow/101678 Mon Mar 31 09:57:10 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.17054 Fri Apr 4 10:49:10 2003 @@ -147,6 +147,11 @@ Assigning to GStreamer ------- Additional Comments From in...@pu... 2003-03-31 09:57 ------- Created an attachment (id=15338) Here's a patch for 0.6 I cooked up without access to a compiler. Could somebody please test this? + +------- Additional Comments From in...@pu... 2003-04-04 10:49 ------- +Created an attachment (id=15473) +more important fix - invalid use of g_error in gst_init + |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-04-04 18:03:45
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by rb...@ro.... --- shadow/101678 Fri Apr 4 10:49:10 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.27990 Fri Apr 4 13:03:40 2003 @@ -152,6 +152,10 @@ ------- Additional Comments From in...@pu... 2003-04-04 10:49 ------- Created an attachment (id=15473) more important fix - invalid use of g_error in gst_init + +------- Additional Comments From rb...@ro... 2003-04-04 13:03 ------- +We should never use exit() inside a library. Just return or use +g_error() or so. Imo, using g_error here is fine. |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-04-04 21:33:06
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by in...@pu.... --- shadow/101678 Fri Apr 4 13:03:40 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.11663 Fri Apr 4 16:33:02 2003 @@ -156,6 +156,21 @@ more important fix - invalid use of g_error in gst_init ------- Additional Comments From rb...@ro... 2003-04-04 13:03 ------- We should never use exit() inside a library. Just return or use g_error() or so. Imo, using g_error here is fine. + +------- Additional Comments From in...@pu... 2003-04-04 16:33 ------- +1) gst_init parses command line parameters. + +2) gst_init only returns if it could initialize safely (currently that +includes parsing all command line parameters). That's according to the +docs. + +3) g_error is "A convenience function/macro to log an error message. +Error messages are always fatal, resulting in a call to abort() to +terminate the application. This function will result in a core dump; +don't use it for errors you expect. Using this function indicates a +bug in your program, i.e. an assertion failure." +And no, I don't want a SIGSEGV when somebody passed a wrong argument +to a gst program. |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-04-05 08:11:53
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by rb...@ro.... --- shadow/101678 Fri Apr 4 16:33:02 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.14325 Sat Apr 5 03:11:50 2003 @@ -171,6 +171,13 @@ Error messages are always fatal, resulting in a call to abort() to terminate the application. This function will result in a core dump; don't use it for errors you expect. Using this function indicates a bug in your program, i.e. an assertion failure." And no, I don't want a SIGSEGV when somebody passed a wrong argument to a gst program. + +------- Additional Comments From rb...@ro... 2003-04-05 03:11 ------- +But then you're saying that we should use g_error() (it is exactly +what we want here if something goes fatally wrong in gst_init() when +it shouldn't return) but that gst_init() shouldn't use g_error() on a +bad commandline parameter, and that's not something inside gst_init(), +but in the popt callbacks, right? |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-04-06 14:36:57
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by rb...@ro.... --- shadow/101678 Sat Apr 5 03:11:50 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.30564 Sun Apr 6 10:36:53 2003 @@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ Component: gstreamer (core) AssignedTo: gst...@bu... ReportedBy: un...@bu... QAContact: gst...@bu... TargetMilestone: 0.3.3 URL: -Summary: "gnome-sound-recorder -r" segfaults without a filename. +Summary: [0.6.1 candidate] "gnome-sound-recorder -r" segfaults without a filename. Package: gnome-media Severity: normal Version: 2.1.0 Synopsis: "gnome-sound-recorder -r" segfaults without a filename. Bugzilla-Product: gnome-media @@ -178,6 +178,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From rb...@ro... 2003-04-05 03:11 ------- But then you're saying that we should use g_error() (it is exactly what we want here if something goes fatally wrong in gst_init() when it shouldn't return) but that gst_init() shouldn't use g_error() on a bad commandline parameter, and that's not something inside gst_init(), but in the popt callbacks, right? + +------- Additional Comments From rb...@ro... 2003-04-06 10:36 ------- +OK, second one committed to HEAD, marking as 0.6.1 candidate here. |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-04-07 17:00:13
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by rb...@ro.... --- shadow/101678 Sun Apr 6 10:36:53 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.7801 Mon Apr 7 13:00:09 2003 @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ Bug#: 101678 Product: GStreamer Version: 0.6.0 OS: other OS Details: -Status: NEW -Resolution: +Status: RESOLVED +Resolution: FIXED Severity: critical Priority: High Component: gstreamer (core) AssignedTo: gst...@bu... ReportedBy: un...@bu... QAContact: gst...@bu... @@ -181,6 +181,9 @@ it shouldn't return) but that gst_init() shouldn't use g_error() on a bad commandline parameter, and that's not something inside gst_init(), but in the popt callbacks, right? ------- Additional Comments From rb...@ro... 2003-04-06 10:36 ------- OK, second one committed to HEAD, marking as 0.6.1 candidate here. + +------- Additional Comments From rb...@ro... 2003-04-07 13:00 ------- +Applied to 0.6.x CVS. |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-05-02 20:49:11
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by gle...@li.... --- shadow/101678 Mon Apr 7 13:00:09 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.11481 Fri May 2 16:49:06 2003 @@ -184,6 +184,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From rb...@ro... 2003-04-06 10:36 ------- OK, second one committed to HEAD, marking as 0.6.1 candidate here. ------- Additional Comments From rb...@ro... 2003-04-07 13:00 ------- Applied to 0.6.x CVS. + +------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:49 ------- +*** Bug 111652 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-05-02 20:52:03
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by gle...@li.... --- shadow/101678 Fri May 2 16:51:37 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.13315 Fri May 2 16:51:59 2003 @@ -190,6 +190,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:49 ------- *** Bug 111652 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:51 ------- *** Bug 112018 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:51 ------- +*** Bug 107404 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-05-02 20:52:19
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by gle...@li.... --- shadow/101678 Fri May 2 16:51:59 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.13513 Fri May 2 16:52:13 2003 @@ -193,6 +193,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:51 ------- *** Bug 112018 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:51 ------- *** Bug 107404 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:52 ------- +*** Bug 111061 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-05-02 20:52:21
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by gle...@li.... --- shadow/101678 Fri May 2 16:52:13 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.13550 Fri May 2 16:52:15 2003 @@ -196,6 +196,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:51 ------- *** Bug 107404 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:52 ------- *** Bug 111061 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:52 ------- +*** Bug 111174 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-05-02 20:52:24
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by gle...@li.... --- shadow/101678 Fri May 2 16:52:15 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.13674 Fri May 2 16:52:20 2003 @@ -199,6 +199,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:52 ------- *** Bug 111061 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:52 ------- *** Bug 111174 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:52 ------- +*** Bug 111301 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-05-02 20:52:29
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by gle...@li.... --- shadow/101678 Fri May 2 16:52:20 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.13700 Fri May 2 16:52:24 2003 @@ -202,6 +202,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:52 ------- *** Bug 111174 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:52 ------- *** Bug 111301 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:52 ------- +*** Bug 107158 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-05-02 20:51:41
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by gle...@li.... --- shadow/101678 Fri May 2 16:49:06 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.13109 Fri May 2 16:51:37 2003 @@ -187,6 +187,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From rb...@ro... 2003-04-07 13:00 ------- Applied to 0.6.x CVS. ------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:49 ------- *** Bug 111652 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:51 ------- +*** Bug 112018 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-05-25 02:00:08
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by da...@co.... --- shadow/101678 Fri May 2 16:52:24 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.14843 Sat May 24 21:45:35 2003 @@ -205,6 +205,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:52 ------- *** Bug 111301 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:52 ------- *** Bug 107158 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From da...@co... 2003-05-24 21:45 ------- +*** Bug 113634 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-06-09 02:58:46
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by ne...@ma.... --- shadow/101678 Sat May 24 21:45:35 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.32439 Sun Jun 8 22:58:43 2003 @@ -208,6 +208,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From gle...@li... 2003-05-02 16:52 ------- *** Bug 107158 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From da...@co... 2003-05-24 21:45 ------- *** Bug 113634 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-06-08 22:58 ------- +*** Bug 114714 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-06-12 05:05:59
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by ne...@ma.... --- shadow/101678 Sun Jun 8 22:58:43 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.9989 Thu Jun 12 01:05:55 2003 @@ -211,6 +211,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From da...@co... 2003-05-24 21:45 ------- *** Bug 113634 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-06-08 22:58 ------- *** Bug 114714 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-06-12 01:05 ------- +*** Bug 114981 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-07-04 21:43:54
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by ne...@ma.... --- shadow/101678 Thu Jun 12 01:05:55 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.29276 Fri Jul 4 17:43:45 2003 @@ -214,6 +214,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-06-08 22:58 ------- *** Bug 114714 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-06-12 01:05 ------- *** Bug 114981 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-07-04 17:43 ------- +*** Bug 115850 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-07-04 21:46:28
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by ne...@ma.... --- shadow/101678 Fri Jul 4 17:43:45 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.30148 Fri Jul 4 17:46:16 2003 @@ -217,6 +217,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-06-12 01:05 ------- *** Bug 114981 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-07-04 17:43 ------- *** Bug 115850 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-07-04 17:46 ------- +*** Bug 115707 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-07-05 14:34:17
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by ne...@ma.... --- shadow/101678 Fri Jul 4 17:46:16 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.4427 Sat Jul 5 10:34:13 2003 @@ -220,6 +220,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-07-04 17:43 ------- *** Bug 115850 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-07-04 17:46 ------- *** Bug 115707 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-07-05 10:34 ------- +*** Bug 116747 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-07-31 18:18:18
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by ne...@ma.... --- shadow/101678 Sat Jul 5 10:34:13 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.14635 Thu Jul 31 14:18:10 2003 @@ -223,6 +223,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-07-04 17:46 ------- *** Bug 115707 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-07-05 10:34 ------- *** Bug 116747 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-07-31 14:18 ------- +*** Bug 118703 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-08-13 01:08:26
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by ne...@ma.... --- shadow/101678 Tue Aug 12 21:08:06 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.4297 Tue Aug 12 21:08:18 2003 @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-07-31 14:18 ------- *** Bug 118703 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-08-12 21:08 ------- *** Bug 119703 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-08-12 21:08 ------- +*** Bug 119741 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-08-13 01:15:54
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by ne...@ma.... --- shadow/101678 Thu Jul 31 14:18:10 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.4223 Tue Aug 12 21:08:06 2003 @@ -226,6 +226,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-07-05 10:34 ------- *** Bug 116747 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-07-31 14:18 ------- *** Bug 118703 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-08-12 21:08 ------- +*** Bug 119703 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
From: <bug...@wi...> - 2003-08-25 02:15:11
|
Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter your comments there. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101678 Changed by ne...@ma.... --- shadow/101678 Tue Aug 12 21:08:18 2003 +++ shadow/101678.tmp.13570 Sun Aug 24 22:15:04 2003 @@ -232,6 +232,9 @@ ------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-08-12 21:08 ------- *** Bug 119703 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-08-12 21:08 ------- *** Bug 119741 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** + +------- Additional Comments From ne...@ma... 2003-08-24 22:15 ------- +*** Bug 120555 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |