[GridSim-users] Doubt with ResFailureEx03

[Vinicius P. <vin...@gm...>]

Hi people,

I'm running the ResFailure.example03 and I have some doubts.
I run with two failureTimePattern configuration: one with
HyperExponential(25, 100, 4) and other with HyperExponential(250, 100,
4);

My expectation was that using 250 as avarega instead of 25 would lead
to a smalllest CPU time since the interval between failures increased.
But the opposite occurred.
I don't undestood this behaviour. Can someone give me a help on this?

Best regards,

Vinicius Pinheiro

with HyperExponential(25, 100, 4);