installation problems - gtk

  • ben_z

    ben_z - 2006-05-08

    I'm running CentOS 4, and am unable to install Gourmet successfully , using either the rpm or the tarball. Either way, after installation running gourmet yields

    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File "/usr/bin/gourmet", line 33, in ?
        import gourmet.GourmetRecipeManager
      File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gourmet/", line 4, in ?
        import prefs, prefsGui, shopgui, reccard, convertGui, fnmatch, tempfile
      File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gourmet/", line 2, in ?
        import recipeManager, convert, WidgetSaver, reccard
      File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gourmet/", line 17, in ?
        from importers.importer import parse_range
      File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gourmet/importers/", line 2, in ?
        import interactive_importer
      File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gourmet/importers/", line 14, in ?
        import imageBrowser
      File "/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gourmet/importers/", line 23, in ?
        class ImageBrowser (gtk.IconView):
    AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'IconView'

    Any suggestions? Is something wrong with my gtk packages?

    rpm -qa python pygtk2 gnome-python2 libglade2 metakit python-imaging


    • tom

      tom - 2006-05-08

      I need to update the gtk version -- gtk 2.6 is needed for iconview. You only actually need the IconView in one small piece of gourmet at the moment - image selection from generic web imports. I should be able to put some try:/except: blocks around the relevant code and just give people with gtk 2.4 a slightly crippled but mostly fine Gourmet -- that's only worth the effort if there are still a lot of folks with gtk 2.4.x -- are there?

    • ben_z

      ben_z - 2006-05-09

      thanks for the quick response - look forward to trying out gourmet whenever I get my hands on gtk2.6.


Log in to post a comment.

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:

No, thanks