Re: [Gramps-users] Kubuntu and other distros with GRAMPS

[Dianne Reuby <pramclub@ya...>]

Thanks for all the feedback. I've thought about running the classic
view, but when Canonical make statements that they plan to go Unity-only
in a very short time, it makes me think I may have to look at other
options fairly soon anyway.

Dianne

Re: [Gramps-users] Kubuntu and other distros with GRAMPS

[Duncan Lithgow <duncan.lithgow@gm...>]

As I hope you've gather from peoples replies you should not have any
problem running Gramps on KDE. Remember to export to XML before a big
change like that.

You can still run Ubuntu with the familiar interface rather than
Unity. Before giving your password you should see some options at the
bottom of the screen. One of them lets you choose the desktop
experience you want. If you prefer the old style just choose Ubuntu
Classic before logging in.

Duncan

-- 
'The unconsidered life is not worth living' - Socrates

Re: [Gramps-users] Windows version of 3.2.6 or 3.3

[Jérôme <romjerome@ya...>]

> At the time of the 3.2.6 release I created a standard installer (patched 
> to fixed narrative web bug in 3.2.6 release), for whatever reason it 
> does not appear on download page

Thanks!
It should be available on sourceforge, now. :)

http://sourceforge.net/projects/gramps/files/Stable/3.2.6/



Stephen George a écrit :
> At the time of the 3.2.6 release I created a standard installer (patched 
> to fixed narrative web bug in 3.2.6 release), for whatever reason it 
> does not appear on download page
> 
> So I put it on my dropbox
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11340806/gramps-3.2.6-1.exe
> 
> Note: On 64 bit operating system it installs to "Program Files (x86)" 
> it's not a 64 bit aware installation.
> I've been reluctant to put the effort in to target 64 bit, as I think 
> users are targeting the  AIO version so they don't have to install all 
> the dependencies themselves. (as noted below)
> 
> best regards
> Steve
> 
> On 31/05/2011 4:10 AM, Peter Landgren wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Look at the windows download page.
>>
>> http://www.gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=Download&grampsd_wiki_session
>>
>> There is a 3.2.6 AIO (All In One) version, which includes all dependencies.
>>
>> /Peter
>>
>>> The 3.2.5 build crashes a lot due to the pedigreeview bug.  Is there
>>> anyone working
>>> on building a windows (.exe) version, and
>>> If so what is the eta?
>>>
>>> - Thanks
>>>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, 
> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
> Download your free trial now. 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-users mailing list
> Gramps-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users
> 

Re: [Gramps-users] Windows version of 3.2.6 or 3.3

[Stephen George <steve_geo@op...>]

At the time of the 3.2.6 release I created a standard installer (patched 
to fixed narrative web bug in 3.2.6 release), for whatever reason it 
does not appear on download page

So I put it on my dropbox
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11340806/gramps-3.2.6-1.exe

Note: On 64 bit operating system it installs to "Program Files (x86)" 
it's not a 64 bit aware installation.
I've been reluctant to put the effort in to target 64 bit, as I think 
users are targeting the  AIO version so they don't have to install all 
the dependencies themselves. (as noted below)

best regards
Steve

On 31/05/2011 4:10 AM, Peter Landgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Look at the windows download page.
>
> http://www.gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=Download&grampsd_wiki_session
>
> There is a 3.2.6 AIO (All In One) version, which includes all dependencies.
>
> /Peter
>
>> The 3.2.5 build crashes a lot due to the pedigreeview bug.  Is there
>> anyone working
>> on building a windows (.exe) version, and
>> If so what is the eta?
>>
>> - Thanks
>>

Re: [Gramps-users] Kubuntu and other distros with GRAMPS

[Brad Rogers <brad@fi...>]

On Mon, 30 May 2011 19:25:09 +0100
Dianne Reuby <pramclub@...> wrote:

Hello Dianne,

> The GRAMPS documentation talks about GRAMPS using GTK, which I though
> was part of Gnome - so how can it run on Kubuntu? (You don't need to
> try and explain that to me - I'm just demonstrating my level of
> incompetence!)

I run Gramps on a Debian/KDE machine.  It works without issue.  When
installing the Gramps package, any requirements not already fulfilled
will be met.  Usually, that means various GTK/Gnome libraries.

-- 
 Regards  _
         / )           "The blindingly obvious is
        / _)rad        never immediately apparent"
Does she always shout at you, does she tell you what to do
Family Life - Sham 69

Re: [Gramps-users] Kubuntu and other distros with GRAMPS

[Peter Hewett <gramps@he...>]

On Tue, 31 May 2011 06:25:09 Dianne Reuby wrote:
> I really don't like Unity very much, so I'm still running Ubuntu 10.10.
> The 11.04 LiveCD doesn't run on my genealogy machine anyway, although I
> had that problem with previous releases which run OK if installed. I've
> been looking at other options, and the only program I use that I don't
> want to change is GRAMPS.
> 
> I thought about Kubuntu, and have been trying the LiveCD - but what
> confuses me is I thought Kubuntu was Ubuntu with KDE instead of Gnome.
> The GRAMPS documentation talks about GRAMPS using GTK, which I though
> was part of Gnome - so how can it run on Kubuntu? (You don't need to try
> and explain that to me - I'm just demonstrating my level of
> incompetence!)
> 
> So I'd be grateful for any feedback from other users on their distros.
> I've been looking through the documentation, but a lot of the tech stuff
> is beyond my ability!

Gramps runs just fine on Kubuntu here.
Just install it from the package manager (KPackageKit) and it will install all 
the dependencies for you.

I have run Gramps on KDE for almost 10 years, and it runs fine.
Most distros will run GTK and QT applications on KDE or Gnome without any 
problems.  These just need to have certain libraries installed, and the 
package manager will automatically do this for you.

HTH


Peter

Re: [Gramps-users] Kubuntu and other distros with GRAMPS

[write and revise <zip@bd...>]

My perfect setup is the latest gramps.  I think the last number is 6.  I used 11.04 ubuntu and together they work perfect.  I am almost afraid to touch anything for fear I will mess it up!  My machine is 6 years old.  A Toshiba Satellite M35x-S311, 1.8 ghz, 1.5 GB and 100 GB hard drive. 

I have an older machine that is actually faster but can use less RAM so it is slower, but it can also run 11.04.  Whatever the problems, Gramps is worth the effort.

I do not have much luck with live distros either.  Try installing 11.04 and the very latest Gramps.  Hope it works for you.






> From: pramclub@...
> To: Gramps-users@...
> Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 19:25:09 +0100
> Subject: [Gramps-users] Kubuntu and other distros with GRAMPS
> 
> I really don't like Unity very much, so I'm still running Ubuntu 10.10.
> The 11.04 LiveCD doesn't run on my genealogy machine anyway, although I
> had that problem with previous releases which run OK if installed. I've
> been looking at other options, and the only program I use that I don't
> want to change is GRAMPS.
> 
> I thought about Kubuntu, and have been trying the LiveCD - but what
> confuses me is I thought Kubuntu was Ubuntu with KDE instead of Gnome.
> The GRAMPS documentation talks about GRAMPS using GTK, which I though
> was part of Gnome - so how can it run on Kubuntu? (You don't need to try
> and explain that to me - I'm just demonstrating my level of
> incompetence!)
> 
> So I'd be grateful for any feedback from other users on their distros.
> I've been looking through the documentation, but a lot of the tech stuff
> is beyond my ability! 
> 
> Thanks for any help,
> 
> Dianne
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, 
> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
> Download your free trial now. 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-users mailing list
> Gramps-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users
 		 	   		  

Re: [Gramps-users] Kubuntu and other distros with GRAMPS

[Cedric Scott <cedric@no...>]

Dianne,

I've been using gramps for several years with KDE and haven't had any 
problems. The only thing you may notice is that gramps takes slightly longer 
to start up, especially the first time you run it after you log in.

I use Debian Squeeze but I'm sure that it will run fine on Kubuntu.

The best of luck,
Cedric

On Monday 30 May 2011 19:25:09 Dianne Reuby wrote:
> I really don't like Unity very much, so I'm still running Ubuntu 10.10.
> The 11.04 LiveCD doesn't run on my genealogy machine anyway, although I
> had that problem with previous releases which run OK if installed. I've
> been looking at other options, and the only program I use that I don't
> want to change is GRAMPS.
> 
> I thought about Kubuntu, and have been trying the LiveCD - but what
> confuses me is I thought Kubuntu was Ubuntu with KDE instead of Gnome.
> The GRAMPS documentation talks about GRAMPS using GTK, which I though
> was part of Gnome - so how can it run on Kubuntu? (You don't need to try
> and explain that to me - I'm just demonstrating my level of
> incompetence!)
> 
> So I'd be grateful for any feedback from other users on their distros.
> I've been looking through the documentation, but a lot of the tech stuff
> is beyond my ability!
> 
> Thanks for any help,
> 
> Dianne
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --- vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
> Download your free trial now.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-users mailing list
> Gramps-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users

Re: [Gramps-users] Kubuntu and other distros with GRAMPS

[Jérôme <romjerome@ya...>]

> I thought about Kubuntu, and have been trying the LiveCD - but what
> confuses me is I thought Kubuntu was Ubuntu with KDE instead of Gnome.
> The GRAMPS documentation talks about GRAMPS using GTK, which I though
> was part of Gnome - so how can it run on Kubuntu? (You don't need to try
> and explain that to me - I'm just demonstrating my level of
> incompetence!)

Documentation was a little bit confused and out of date.
Gnome reference is not important!

'Tips of day' has been improved (program)
and Benny made updates on wiki documentation.

http://www.gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=Gramps_3.2_Wiki_Manual_-_Getting_started
     Vs
http://www.gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=Gramps_3.3_Wiki_Manual_-_Getting_started

We just need GTK for running Gramps.
We can have GTK under KDE, XFCE, etc ... (and qt under GNOME).


PS: most linux distros with DVD installation provides 'gtk' and 'qt'
Ubuntu made some declinaisons oriented to one, but both are available on
ubuntu's repositories.



Jérôme


Dianne Reuby a écrit :
> I really don't like Unity very much, so I'm still running Ubuntu 10.10.
> The 11.04 LiveCD doesn't run on my genealogy machine anyway, although I
> had that problem with previous releases which run OK if installed. I've
> been looking at other options, and the only program I use that I don't
> want to change is GRAMPS.
> 
> I thought about Kubuntu, and have been trying the LiveCD - but what
> confuses me is I thought Kubuntu was Ubuntu with KDE instead of Gnome.
> The GRAMPS documentation talks about GRAMPS using GTK, which I though
> was part of Gnome - so how can it run on Kubuntu? (You don't need to try
> and explain that to me - I'm just demonstrating my level of
> incompetence!)
> 
> So I'd be grateful for any feedback from other users on their distros.
> I've been looking through the documentation, but a lot of the tech stuff
> is beyond my ability! 
> 
> Thanks for any help,
> 
> Dianne
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, 
> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
> Download your free trial now. 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-users mailing list
> Gramps-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users
> 

[Gramps-users] Kubuntu and other distros with GRAMPS

[Dianne Reuby <pramclub@ya...>]

I really don't like Unity very much, so I'm still running Ubuntu 10.10.
The 11.04 LiveCD doesn't run on my genealogy machine anyway, although I
had that problem with previous releases which run OK if installed. I've
been looking at other options, and the only program I use that I don't
want to change is GRAMPS.

I thought about Kubuntu, and have been trying the LiveCD - but what
confuses me is I thought Kubuntu was Ubuntu with KDE instead of Gnome.
The GRAMPS documentation talks about GRAMPS using GTK, which I though
was part of Gnome - so how can it run on Kubuntu? (You don't need to try
and explain that to me - I'm just demonstrating my level of
incompetence!)

So I'd be grateful for any feedback from other users on their distros.
I've been looking through the documentation, but a lot of the tech stuff
is beyond my ability! 

Thanks for any help,

Dianne

Re: [Gramps-users] Windows version of 3.2.6 or 3.3

[Peter Landgren <peter.talken@te...>]

Hi,

Look at the windows download page. 

http://www.gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=Download&grampsd_wiki_session

There is a 3.2.6 AIO (All In One) version, which includes all dependencies.

/Peter

> The 3.2.5 build crashes a lot due to the pedigreeview bug.  Is there
> anyone working
> on building a windows (.exe) version, and
> If so what is the eta?
> 
> - Thanks
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --- vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
> Download your free trial now.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-users mailing list
> Gramps-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users

[Gramps-users] Windows version of 3.2.6 or 3.3

[Alex Pfaffe <alex.pfaffe@gm...>]

The 3.2.5 build crashes a lot due to the pedigreeview bug.  Is there
anyone working
on building a windows (.exe) version, and
If so what is the eta?

- Thanks

Re: [Gramps-users] Regular expression

[doug <dougrb@o2...>]

On 25/05/11 21:08, Serge Noiraud wrote:
> Le 25/05/2011 20:36, doug a écrit :
>> On 25/05/11 18:44, Peter Landgren wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm definitely not an expert on regular expressions, so I
>>> need some help:
>>> I would like to easily find people with names spelled
>>> with on or two "s":
>>> Like Nilson and Nilsson in the same person filter search.
>>>
>>> /Peter
>> Does this work?
>>
>> \s*[a-rt-zA-Z]*[s|ss]\w*
> I don't really know how it works in gramps, but the solution
> should be :
> (s|ss)
>
> The [] means only one character : from a to z and from A to Z
> the () means several characters : in our case s or ss
>
>> Doug
>
>
Ah! thanks for that. I hadn't appreciated the difference 
between [] and ()

Doug

Re: [Gramps-users] Regular expression

[Peter Landgren <peter.talken@te...>]

Serge,

This was what I wanted!

Thanks.

/Peter


> Le 25/05/2011 20:36, doug a écrit :
> > On 25/05/11 18:44, Peter Landgren wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> I'm definitely not an expert on regular expressions, so I need some
> >> help: I would like to easily find people with names spelled with on or
> >> two "s": Like Nilson and Nilsson in the same person filter search.
> >> 
> >> /Peter
> > 
> > Does this work?
> > 
> > \s*[a-rt-zA-Z]*[s|ss]\w*
> 
> I don't really know how it works in gramps, but the solution should be :
> (s|ss)
> 
> The [] means only one character : from a to z and from A to Z
> the () means several characters : in our case s or ss
> 
> > Doug
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --- vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
> Download your free trial now.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-users mailing list
> Gramps-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users

Re: [Gramps-users] Regular expression

[Peter Landgren <peter.talken@te...>]

Johnny,

Maybe I was confusing you. What I meant was that I will supply  the male name.

/Peter 

> Peter Landgren <peter.talken@...> writes:
> > So what I need is a re that can find names with a specific beginning,
> > which could be any possible male name followed by
> > one or two "s" followed by "on"
> 
> For such a task, I would try something like
> .*ss?on$
> 
> For searching "any possible male name" you have to consult a dictionary
> search. REs are not good at gender issues.

Re: [Gramps-users] Regular expression

[Johnny <yggdrasil@gm...>]

Peter Landgren <peter.talken@...> writes:

> So what I need is a re that can find names with a specific beginning,
> which could be any possible male name followed by
> one or two "s" followed by "on"
>
For such a task, I would try something like 
.*ss?on$

For searching "any possible male name" you have to consult a dictionary
search. REs are not good at gender issues.
-- 
Johnny

Re: [Gramps-users] Regular expression

[Serge Noiraud <Serge.Noiraud@fr...>]

Le 25/05/2011 20:36, doug a écrit :
> On 25/05/11 18:44, Peter Landgren wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm definitely not an expert on regular expressions, so I need some help:
>> I would like to easily find people with names spelled with on or two "s":
>> Like Nilson and Nilsson in the same person filter search.
>>
>> /Peter
> Does this work?
>
> \s*[a-rt-zA-Z]*[s|ss]\w*
I don't really know how it works in gramps, but the solution should be :
(s|ss)

The [] means only one character : from a to z and from A to Z
the () means several characters : in our case s or ss

> Doug

Re: [Gramps-users] Regular expression

[Peter Landgren <peter.talken@te...>]

Doug,

Thanks for answering.
Your suggestion
\s*[a-rt-zA-Z]*[s|ss]\w*
gives 6511 persons out of 8937

If I change it to
\s*[a-rt-zA-Z]*[s|ss]on
it gives 3014 persons out of 8937, but I get only those ending in "son" or "sson"

So what I need is a re that can find names with a specific beginning,
which could be any possible male name followed by
one or two "s" followed by "on"

Example I would like to see only name pairs like:
Bengtson
Bengtsson

or 

Carlson
Carlsson

in each filter search.

/Peter


> On 25/05/11 18:44, Peter Landgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm definitely not an expert on regular expressions, so I need some help:
> > I would like to easily find people with names spelled with on or two "s":
> > Like Nilson and Nilsson in the same person filter search.
> > 
> > /Peter
> 
> Does this work?
> 
> \s*[a-rt-zA-Z]*[s|ss]\w*
> 
> 
> Doug
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --- vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
> Download your free trial now.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-users mailing list
> Gramps-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users

Re: [Gramps-users] Regular expression

[doug <dougrb@o2...>]

On 25/05/11 18:44, Peter Landgren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm definitely not an expert on regular expressions, so I need some help:
> I would like to easily find people with names spelled with on or two "s":
> Like Nilson and Nilsson in the same person filter search.
>
> /Peter
>
Does this work?

\s*[a-rt-zA-Z]*[s|ss]\w*


Doug

[Gramps-users] Regular expression

[Peter Landgren <peter.talken@te...>]

Hi,

I'm definitely not an expert on regular expressions, so I need some help:
I would like to easily find people with names spelled with on or two "s":
Like Nilson and Nilsson in the same person filter search.

/Peter

Re: [Gramps-users] Question for those in the know....

[Doug Blank <doug.blank@gm...>]

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Gerald Britton
<gerald.britton@...> wrote:
>> Ok, this is a question that very easily could be taken as a unpleasant dig against the hard working developers of Gramps and I want to assure everyone that it's not intended as such.
>
> No offense taken!
>
>>
>> I'm simply curious if anyone has proposed incorporating something like sqlite into gramps so that an object, such as a document in any form, pdf, jpeg, text, etc., can be stored into the DB in it's native form and associated with a name, description, etc. without caring about the underlying OS?
>
> Actually it is not a technical problem to store objects in the current
> database (bsddb).  It is flexible enough to do that just fine.
> However, a conscious design decision was taken some time ago to NOT do
> that.  There are many reasons, including:
>
> 1. Files ystems typically do a much better job of storing arbitrary
> files than do databases in terms of disk space use, access methods,
> performance, security and robustness.
> 2. Many users will want to edit their images and documents, attach
> them to emails to send to friends and family, upload them to Facebook
> or other sites and generally use them detached from their genealogy
> studies.  To support all that from *within* gramps would be a
> tremendous effort with little real gain.
> 3. If the database is lost or corrupted in some way, chances are that
> the user would lose any documents stored in it.  In such a case, a
> user would look to the gramps team to retrieve their docs.  I'm fairly
> certain the team doesn't want that job.

I agree with everything that Gerald said.

Of course, having said that, there are still things that could be done
in Gramps to make it appear that images are under some centralized
organizational system.

Perhaps you aren't interested so much in having files in a database,
but rather some particular feature?

-Doug

>>
>> --
>>    << MCT >>   Michael C Tiernan.
>>    Is God a performance artist?
>>    http://www.linkedin.com/in/mtiernan
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
>> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
>> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
>> Download your free trial now.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gramps-users mailing list
>> Gramps-users@...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Gerald Britton
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
> Download your free trial now.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-users mailing list
> Gramps-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users
>

Re: [Gramps-users] Question for those in the know....

[Gerald Britton <gerald.britton@gm...>]

> Ok, this is a question that very easily could be taken as a unpleasant dig against the hard working developers of Gramps and I want to assure everyone that it's not intended as such.

No offense taken!

>
> I'm simply curious if anyone has proposed incorporating something like sqlite into gramps so that an object, such as a document in any form, pdf, jpeg, text, etc., can be stored into the DB in it's native form and associated with a name, description, etc. without caring about the underlying OS?

Actually it is not a technical problem to store objects in the current
database (bsddb).  It is flexible enough to do that just fine.
However, a conscious design decision was taken some time ago to NOT do
that.  There are many reasons, including:

1. Files ystems typically do a much better job of storing arbitrary
files than do databases in terms of disk space use, access methods,
performance, security and robustness.
2. Many users will want to edit their images and documents, attach
them to emails to send to friends and family, upload them to Facebook
or other sites and generally use them detached from their genealogy
studies.  To support all that from *within* gramps would be a
tremendous effort with little real gain.
3. If the database is lost or corrupted in some way, chances are that
the user would lose any documents stored in it.  In such a case, a
user would look to the gramps team to retrieve their docs.  I'm fairly
certain the team doesn't want that job.

>
> --
>    << MCT >>   Michael C Tiernan.
>    Is God a performance artist?
>    http://www.linkedin.com/in/mtiernan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
> Download your free trial now.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-users mailing list
> Gramps-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users
>



-- 
Gerald Britton

[Gramps-users] Question for those in the know....

[Michael C Tiernan <michael.tiernan@gm...>]

Ok, this is a question that very easily could be taken as a unpleasant dig against the hard working developers of Gramps and I want to assure everyone that it's not intended as such.

I'm simply curious if anyone has proposed incorporating something like sqlite into gramps so that an object, such as a document in any form, pdf, jpeg, text, etc., can be stored into the DB in it's native form and associated with a name, description, etc. without caring about the underlying OS?

-- 
    << MCT >>   Michael C Tiernan.
    Is God a performance artist?
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/mtiernan

Re: [Gramps-users] Census input for family

[Jérôme <romjerome@ya...>]

Hi,

> Do I just have to make a census event for each family member?

I share one census event between all family members.
But this works better if I set descriptions/address for different census 
events for the same census (source).

You could also try the Census Addon:
http://gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php?title=Census_Addons


Jérôme


Ida Louise Johnson a écrit :
> New to GRAMPS after using TMG for the past 8 years. I was able to put 
> the census event in for the head of household and then attach each 
> family member as a witness to that event.
> How do I show family members on census event in GRAMPS? Do I just have 
> to make a census event for each family member?
> 
> Thanks for the help!
> 
> Some of it's magic! Some of it's tragic! But I've had a good life 
> always! - Jimmy Buffett
> 
> / Ida Louise /
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, 
> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
> Download your free trial now. 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-users mailing list
> Gramps-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-users

[Gramps-users] Census input for family

[Ida Louise Johnson <eyeljay@gm...>]

New to GRAMPS after using TMG for the past 8 years. I was able to put the
census event in for the head of household and then attach each family member
as a witness to that event.
How do I show family members on census event in GRAMPS? Do I just have to
make a census event for each family member?

Thanks for the help!

Some of it's magic! Some of it's tragic! But I've had a good life always! -
Jimmy Buffett

*Ida Louise*