I don't agree with that comment. I hope you're not suggesting that we look up
On Friday 24 April 2009, Benny Malengier wrote:
> 2009/4/20 Serge Noiraud <Serge.Noiraud@free.fr
> > Hi, everybody.
> > Thanks for the info on "is not" and "!=".
> > If you think the problem is solved, I can commit the changes in 3.1 and
> > trunk
> > There is no bug report for that and we could forget.
> Please do. Add a comment above the != that != must be used and not is not,
> or some other developer might mistakenly change it back to is not.