Dear Brian, Kess, and Peter:

Thank you so much for your help, and I appreciate all of you truely...

I understand the waiting period, and someone else committing for you.  You are all correct in the I am in my infancy with Python and Gramps.  I will continue to work with everyone, and I do appreciate it all.

I will try to double check my code for improvements before I submit again...


On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 3:29 AM, Kees Bakker <> wrote:
Hi Rob,

It is probably a good idea if you look at the differences between my checked-in
version and the one that you sent me.

We all appreciate your enthousiasm. But personally I would like to see your
programming skills improve. That's why I go over them and make changes. I don't
know if Peter just checked them in unmodified. That way you'll never know what
you should improve.

Here are a couple of things that I noticed in the latest delta:

* easter() can be a generic utility fuinction (does not have to be a WebCalReport
 function). Please also rename to _easter to make it local to

* why the extra self.use_home variable? It is just a copy of self.home_link.

* why the extra _note variable at line 1049?

* you're making WebCalReport.process_holiday_file() more confusing because by
 adding the 'year' argument and not using it. And there is also another
 process_holiday_file() too.

* calendar_build() still uses self.year

* duplicate new function display_nav_links() ???? what is that?

* why not rename that argument "list_" when you created write_events?
 And why not look at the code a bit? There is a lines variable, not used.

* blank_year() did get a new argument (year), but self.year is still used.

* and more...

Peter (assuming you are the Peter that Rob is talking about), why did you let
this slip by?


On Monday 28 July 2008, Rob Healey wrote:
> Dear Kess:
> Thank you for being willing to commit for me.  I do appreciate it very much,
> but someday, I would like to be able to do it myself.  Become one of the
> trusted elite...
> Instead of saying that you can fix my mistakes, I would have rather seeing
> make changes to make it better than I had it.  I run through my changes to
> an exhaustive amount of times to make sure it works and it works well....
> Sincerely,
> Rob
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Kees Bakker <> wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > I'm happy to commit the changes for you. That also gives me
> > the opportunity to look at the changes and to correct them before
> > checking them in.
> >
> >                Kees
> >
> >
> > Op zondag 27 juli 2008, schreef Rob Healey:
> >  > Dear Brian:
> > >
> > > I have submitted some more WebCal code enhancements and optimization of
> > code
> > > to Peter Lundgreen.
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to get svn commit access for myself?
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Rob
> > >
> >
> >
> >

Evil has been dealt a serious blow, but will be back