On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Hans Boldt <hans@boldts.net> wrote:
Sure, in the absence of a "stillbirth" event type, there are different approaches. But having just a death event without a corresponding birth implies that the date of birth is unknown. Having a birth event implies a live birth. I think having a "stillbirth" event would be the best way to avoid any possible confusion or ambiguity.

Very interesting! Thanks for explaining. I guess this does make sense.
(That why I like asking questiions.)  ;)
--
    << MCT >>   Michael C Tiernan.
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/mtiernan
    Non Impediti Ratione Cogatationis