Greetings:

I am all for this idea!  There should be a separate category for 3rd- party addons...

Sincerely yours,
Rob G. Healey


On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Paul Franklin <pf.98052@gmail.com> wrote:
It's not clear to me that users always understand the
distinction we make about third-party addons not being
a part of the "core" gramps.  Perhaps (I am guessing)
because of that initial window where it offers to install
all of them (or something like that; I don't normally run
gramps on a machine with access to the Internet so I
don't get that window when I start gramps).

But for whatever reason I sometimes see bug reports
which involve such third-party addons (or seem to, as
some bug reports are not too clear).  For instance
http://www.gramps-project.org/bugs/view.php?id=5460
which after looking at I decided might be about one.

So I was wondering if there might be some way to
easily flag such bugs, in the bug tracker.  Perhaps
something like a "third-party addon" tag would make
sense?  That might make searching for such things
easier.

It wouldn't stop a user from not contacting the addon
author of course, which is the real problem.  But it
might allow such authors to more easily search the
tracker, so see if their addon had any such reports.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
Gramps-devel mailing list
Gramps-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel



--
Sincerely yours,
Rob G. Healey