If I am still misunderstanding what you have said is, REMOVE the sidebar/ filter?  If yes, then NEVER let that happen!!!

Sincerely yours,
Rob G. Healey

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Tim Lyons <guy.linton@gmail.com> wrote:

Benny Malengier wrote:
> I don't like the idea of a dialog for search much. This is not a
> texteditor,
> but search on a column view, no need to block the view somehow with a
> dialog.

Sorry, my fault, I confused things by the way I mentioned top filter in my
argument. I think you have misunderstood.

Personally I don't think there is much needing a change. Even though I know
about the sidebar, I will still use the topbar.

What I meant was, If you want to make a change, then:
(a) remove the side filter,
(b) leave the top filter exactly as it is, except
(c) add 'custom filter' to the bottom of the top filter drop-down, and
allowing the user to specify one of the filters he had defined in the filter
(d) if the user selects the custom filter, then the filter name he selects
could be displayed in the top filter where the filter criterion is normally

View this message in context: http://gramps.1791082.n4.nabble.com/Proposal-to-remove-topbar-filter-tp3052501p3053387.html
Sent from the GRAMPS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
Gramps-devel mailing list