If your library is licensed under GPL
it cannot be used by LGPL-licensed libraries.
Please consider changing the license to LGPL
unless the former is your intention.
I have no idea. As a non-lawyer I will stick
with exception-free licenses, because I can never
be sure, if they work as expected or not.
I am also afraid of using libraries with exceptions.
Not sure if I'm alone with that.
If you have the chance to talk to a lawyer maybe
that would be best.
Sebastian
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Logged In: YES
user_id=572001
Originator: NO
Would you like to consider the "GNU General Public License with runtime exception" (RGPL)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/17_intro/license.html
How do you think about the details from the following discussions?
- "(L)GPL and C++ templates issue"
http://groups.google.de/groups?threadm=4174046c%241_2%40news.bluewin.ch
- "Writing an exception to LGPL for a C++ template library"
http://mailman.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/discussion/2006-October/006420.html
Logged In: YES
user_id=1022691
Originator: YES
I have no idea. As a non-lawyer I will stick
with exception-free licenses, because I can never
be sure, if they work as expected or not.
I am also afraid of using libraries with exceptions.
Not sure if I'm alone with that.
If you have the chance to talk to a lawyer maybe
that would be best.
Sebastian
Logged In: YES
user_id=572001
Originator: NO
Would you like to ask for updates on the open issues in a news group?