#604 Clickable marker ignored on slow devices like WinCE/PhoneME

Next Release
closed-fixed
nobody
None
7
2012-08-19
2012-08-18
No

IIRC @sk750 asked somewhere if I have seen clickable marker failure recently. I hadn't, but now when using on WinCE / PhoneME, clickable markers appear to be ignore; they're drawn, but touching a marker just highlights the controls, doesn't open the context menu.

Nothing relevant on the console.

On all other devices: Nokia E72, Android, Microemulator, markers seem to work. Though on Nokia E72 they occasionally fail, and I think this is a key to the puzzle.

I think it's a race condition, clickable markers are updated so that on slower devices, the structure is empty most of the time, while on faster devices, it's populated most of the time.

The markers are reset at start of ImageCollector.draw cycle, added in SingleTile when a url-containing or phone-containing or style-file-defined marker is found.

Any suggestions what would be the correct timing (placement) of the marker reset call?

Discussion

  • Jyrki Kuoppala

    Jyrki Kuoppala - 2012-08-18
    • milestone: --> Next Release
    • priority: 5 --> 7
     
  • Jyrki Kuoppala

    Jyrki Kuoppala - 2012-08-18
    • summary: Clickable marker ignored on WinCE/PhoneME --> Clickable marker ignored on slow devices like WinCE/PhoneME
     
  • sk750

    sk750 - 2012-08-19

    > IIRC @sk750 asked somewhere if I have seen clickable marker failure recently.

    IIRC had asked if open the webpage from the context menu works under Android for you.

     
  • Jyrki Kuoppala

    Jyrki Kuoppala - 2012-08-19

    OK - yes, it works.

     
  • Jyrki Kuoppala

    Jyrki Kuoppala - 2012-08-19

    Moved to start of node (POI) drawing, solved the issue for the WinCE device I use.

     
  • Jyrki Kuoppala

    Jyrki Kuoppala - 2012-08-19
    • status: open --> closed-fixed
     

Log in to post a comment.

Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.

Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter:

JavaScript is required for this form.





No, thanks