You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(8) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(11) |
2004 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(94) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(27) |
Jun
(69) |
Jul
(48) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(46) |
Oct
(25) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(19) |
2005 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(58) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(59) |
Oct
(38) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(19) |
2006 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(54) |
Apr
(53) |
May
(72) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(47) |
Nov
(99) |
Dec
(16) |
2007 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(31) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(8) |
2008 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(13) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(5) |
2009 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(12) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(17) |
2010 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(36) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(61) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(6) |
2011 |
Jan
(32) |
Feb
(43) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(51) |
Jun
(34) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(2) |
2013 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(31) |
Apr
(4) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2014 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(23) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(13) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(5) |
2015 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(6) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
(26) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(6) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2017 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
2021 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(57) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2022 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(18) |
2023 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: John S. S. <to...@to...> - 2002-09-21 08:29:25
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The attached patch modifies the gpsim sources to the extent that they wil= l=20 compile under gcc 3.2. The majority of changes involved adding "using=20 namespace std" to some files, and removing the default arguments from met= hods=20 in .cc files. The other change was a <static_cast> in src/fopen-path.cc. I'm not 100% s= ure=20 about whether that's the way to do it, since I don't normally use C++. cheers, John -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Messages with missing or bad signatures may have been forged or = modified in transit! iD8DBQE9jC3Z0BW7kPcXjRURAml/AJ4mgCggAaUL2gRWizKvVa5JG6liPwCfVY2G SOXEA14D18XjhIysMlsD+nE=3D =3D8+t7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: John S. S. <to...@to...> - 2002-09-21 08:10:32
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Can someone please tell me which features of the pic16f877 are yet to be=20 implemented? The website says this chip is not fully supported yet. cheers, John -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Messages with missing or bad signatures may have been forged or = modified in transit! iD8DBQE9jClr0BW7kPcXjRURAgVUAJsGDcVKUhUrB6km/vtGIIS8UQGPBgCeLdWu LGgw4ySmxc3c6kG4FKmJ4z4=3D =3DR0rE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Scott D. <sc...@da...> - 2002-08-10 15:03:30
|
All attempts to release a new version are constantly thwarted by higher priority items. First there was SDCC and now there is contract job. I need gpsim to do some "real" work. The bad news is that gpsim will not be released soon (as I had promised). The good news is that I'll be adding some new features. First of all, the 18Fxxx stuff I know is not thoroughly tested. That's about to change. I'm going to be putting it through the mill. Second, I have a need for an extremely complicated simulation environment. I plan to add an SRAM module and a '373 type latch to the modules. Scott |
From: Scott D. <sc...@da...> - 2002-07-28 01:48:34
|
While investigating an alternative to readline I decided that using pthreads would be the easiest approach. The idea is straight forward and illustrated here: http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gdk/gdk-threads.html While supposedly written for gtk-2.0, I was able to use this example with gtk-1.2 by commenting out the call to gdk_threads_init (). I then added a new thread: void *text_thread (void *args) { static int i =0; char buf[256]; char *ret; for (;;) { printf("i = %d\n",i++); ret = fgets(buf, 256, stdin); if(ret) fprintf(stdout,"got %s\n",ret); } return NULL; } And added it to the thread pool with: pthread_create (&text_interface, NULL, text_thread, &no_args); And this worked exactly as I expected - command line text interface via the console running along side the gui. This was just too simple! Scott |
From: Scott D. <sc...@da...> - 2002-07-27 15:02:27
|
After a week of killing SDCC bugs, I'm going to return toward getting gpsim ready for a release. Next on the agenda is the readline exorcism. I'm going to add a check to configure: --disable-readline If the user selects this option, then the readline library will not be linked in with gpsim. The command line interface will use cin and cout. There will be no tab-completion or history available. Scott |
From: Scott D. <sc...@da...> - 2002-07-22 05:14:39
|
I'm continuing this thread on the gpsim development list, so that others may benefit. On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Jorge Cabral wrote: > Basically I cannot install gpsim. > My students tell me that it is a very good simulator and that you (people > who are working in development) are doing a very good job. > > What I need is a rpm file (or whatever) of the libraries gtk+extra(???) > that are needed in order to install gpsim. rpmfind is your friend http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=gtk%2Bextra I'm currently using gtk+extra-0.99.17. I didn't use the RPM however. Instead, I grabbed the tar ball directly from gtk+extra homepage: http://gtkextra.sourceforge.net/ Scott |
From: Scott D. <sc...@da...> - 2002-07-22 03:05:08
|
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Jorge Cabral wrote: > Hi there! > > I signed the list long ago. > I'm very new to Linux ... I'm not young enough to go to all the troubles of > digging the information. > > Basically ,,, I can not install the gpsim in my Linux system because the > "something extra library" doesn't compile. > > After all the good work u fellows put in the name of Microchip ... You > should make it easy to people like me (that don't like OS at all - I only > like to shift & add bit's around) to migrate to Linux and use your program. > > Has a summary: > I do need a help page in your home page. Put a little time in that ... and > in electronic interface u won't regreated it! Okay. Would you care to be more specific? I've cc'd the gpsim-devel mailing list. If you could join the list, I'd really appreciate continuing the discussion. Regards, Scott |
From: Scott D. <sc...@da...> - 2002-07-22 02:38:22
|
Nothing to say... Just a test |
From: Scott D. <sc...@da...> - 2002-07-22 02:04:12
|
test |