Re: [Gpsbabel-misc] What's the difference between waypoint, track and route?
Brought to you by:
robertl
From: Ulf L. <ulf...@we...> - 2007-03-28 10:48:59
|
Dave Pawson wrote: > > Suggested amendment. > > <glossentry id="xml"> > <glossterm>Geocaching</glossterm> > <glossdef> > <para>GPS based "paper chase", see > <ulink url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geocaching" /></para> > </glossdef> > </glossentry> > > Change the id value to geocaching? > Then have some informal agreement that the id value will be the term > in lowercase, or camelCase if >1 word? > It makes it easy to refer to glossary entries. Right, "xml" is just a typo, left over from copy/paste. > Also > > <glossentry id="itinerary"> > <glossterm>Itinerary</glossterm> > <glossdef> > <para>same as a Route (e.g. used by TomTom)</para> > <glossseealso otherterm="route">route</glossseealso> > </glossdef> > </glossentry> > so that the terms are linked. I had it exactly that way and removed the link again (it looks a bit ugly IMHO and the glossary is pretty small today). However, as the glossary may grow in the future, having the link may make sense. > > <glossdef> > <para>a collection of gas stations, post boxes, shops and > like.</para> > </glossdef> > Could I suggest 'locations' instead of gas stations, which is > colloquial I think. > Right > > >> >> The glossary might be placed in /gpsbabel/xmldoc/chapters/preface.xml >> right before the </preface> tag - or as a standalone "top level" >> item. However, it might better *not* be placed *after* "The Formats" >> section, where no one will find it ;-) > > Or it's own appendix? > > <appendix> > <title>Glossary</title> > <para>Terms that are used in conjunction with GPSBabel.</para> > <glossary> > <glossdiv> > etc > Unsure > > I like the wikipedia link! I can't improve the current text. > I wasn't sure about "paper chase", got it from a dictionary. I've attached an edited version. Regards, ULFL |