Re: [Gpsbabel-code] engima patch

[Robert L. <rob...@gp...>]

On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 9:16 PM, tsteven4 <tst...@gm...> wrote:

> Here is a more comprehensive patch for enigma.   It include the previous
> change in enigma-patch.
>

Thanx.  Applied.

This avoids two more segmentation faults that arose because a null file
> w-enigma was generated in test-all and other formats have issues processing
> null input.  I speculate that the same sensitivity is still demonstrated
> with the geoniche and quovadis inputs below.
>

Both are geocaching programs for Palm/OS.  As such, they're pretty much
"write only" to the device - it's not like there is any user data trapped
in those formats waiting to be liberated by GPSBabel.   I suspect that
making them not crash won't be difficult, but we should limit the amount of
effort we spend on corner cases in formats that nobody is using.  The fixes
I committed to those are about the limit of effort I'll spend on those.

The test-all summary including all the patches I sent in today is withing
> striking distance of 0 fatals.  We have also made significant progress on
> non-fatal errors and unexpected output.


Very nice.