[Gprename-users] Re : Feature Request: Sorting

[Zurd <zu...@ya...>]

Actually if I remember correctly the first release of GPRename 0.92 had =0A=
a column date but I took it out for version 1.0 :-)=0A=0AI'll put that in t=
he to do.=0A=0AAlso for the GTK+ limitation with CTRL-SHIFT not working lik=
e in Windows,=0Aif you remember I added this bug to Gnome a while ago after=
 your input=0Aabout it and I receive an e-mail for it like 1 month ago :=0A=
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D410497=0A=0AThe thing that chan=
ged is the version which now shows SVN trunk, so =0Amaybe in the next versi=
on of Gnome that feature will actually be there!=0A=0A=0A=0A----- Message i=
nitial ----=0ADe : Lacrocivious Acrophosist <alt...@ya...>=0A=C0 : =
gpr...@li...=0AEnvoy=E9 le : mardi 20 novembre 2007=
, 00 h 05 min 23 s=0AObjet : [Gprename-users] Feature Request: Sorting=0A=
=0AToday while renaming a bunch of files belonging to=0Aseveral different s=
ets but beginning with the same=0Asequentially incremented character sequen=
ces, I was=0Aonly able to isolate the sets by opening a file=0Amanager wind=
ow and sorting the list by date. From that=0Adisplay I could manually selec=
t the files in GPRename=0Athat belonged to one set.=0A=0AThis was a labor-i=
ntensive exercise, made worse by the=0AGTK+ limitation on highlighting more=
 than one=0Aselection range by using CTRL-SHIFT (not available in=0AGTK+).=
=0A=0AIt would be great if sorting by date was available in=0Athe GPRename =
files listing. I suspect that the reason=0Ait is not already there is that =
it will be difficult=0Ato do.=0A=0AThank you once again for this program; t=
he current=0Arelease has proven to be flawlessly stable on my=0Asystems.=0A=
=0A=0A=0A      D=E9couvrez les styles qui font sensation sur Yahoo! Qu=E9be=
c Avatars.=0Ahttp://cf.avatars.yahoo.com/