gpkcs11-users Mailing List for gpkcs11
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
cypherfox
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Philipp <pg...@fu...> - 2005-08-22 14:07:52
|
Hi, Should I switch to german? Thank you very much for making gpkcs11 available as OpenSource! I stumbled across gpkcs11 about a week ago, and tried to get it running, bu= t=20 without much luck. gpkcs11 itself compiles somewhat cleanly, but I didn=B4t succeed to get=20 ceay_token linked together. I tried it with openssl-0.9.8 and openssl-0.9.6= ,=20 but it doesn=B4t work. Does anyone have up-to-date binaries (perhaps for SuSE 9.3 or compatible?)? How is the specialized openssl variante supposed to be linked with ceay_tok= en?=20 statically or dynamically? What about renaming the special openssl library to something different?=20 opensslgspkcs or something? Then there wouldn=B4t be much chance for confli= cts. Is it really necessary not to distribute the openssl package with the gpkcs= 11=20 package? Distributing it together (in a already prepared way) would help a = =20 lot, I think. And having nicely installable binary RPM=B4s/dpkg=B4s would also not be a b= ad=20 idea. Now regarding the registry: =46or the PKCS#11 drivers, I am currently proposing /usr/lib/pks11/*.so as = a=20 "registry" for all PKCS#11 drivers. So I would suggest that gpkcs11 install= s=20 itself there too. =46or the gpkcs Tokens, I would suggest something like /usr/lib/gpkcs11-tok= ens/=20 or something. gpkcs should automatically try to load all the tokens which are installed i= n=20 that directory. Regarding the PersistentRootDir, the ceay_token should automatically use=20 ~/.ceay_token/ (and the other tokens accordingly). Where is the TCSC Token implementation? I could not find it. Where is the DATA Token implementation? Regarding PKCS#11 client, I would suggest to bundle pkcs11-tool from OpenSC= =20 with gpkcs#11. http://www.opensc.org/ I found another soft-token PKCS#11 driver: http://people.su.se/~lha/soft-pkcs11/ (I wish there were a mixture between soft-pkcs11 and gpkcs. The simple desi= gn=20 from soft-pkcs11, the functionality of ceay-token) I attached the pkcs11.log file with the error messages: /* CI_GetDLLHandle(): Opening Dynamic Library=20 '/usr/local/lib/libceay_tok.so.1.0.1' failed: /usr/local/lib/libceay_tok.so= =2E1 =2E0.1: undefined symbol: CI_CeaySymbolTable(GENERAL ERROR) */ /* CI_InitTokenDll(): retrieving dll handle (GENERAL ERROR) */ /* CI_TokenInit(): Init'ing of Token 'CEAY-TOKEN' failed: no valid init=20 symbol(GENERAL ERROR) */ Thank you for your help, Philipp G=FChring |
|
From: lucky b. <luc...@ya...> - 2004-03-04 15:19:14
|
Hello, I have been looking for this on the internet for a week or so now. I have an installed gpkcs11, which I have copied to a different pc (Suse linux) I have reinstalled the openssl 0.9.4, did the readaption of the code for the ceaytoken, but the system does not recompile. I have as output from 'make all': cd . && aclocal -I /usr/pcshare/tc/share/tcpu':no such file or directory make: *** [aclocal.m4] Error 1 ./configure --enable-ceay_token works. Why is there this aclocal line? The directory /usr/pcshare does indeed not exist. Thanks anyone for help. LR __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com |
|
From: Jonathan Schulze-H. <sch...@in...> - 2003-05-28 18:49:37
|
Tail end of gcc (2.95.3) build on Solaris 7
----
making all in tools...
make[1]: Entering directory
`/space/jcs/rabah/gpkcs11-0.7.2/ceay_token/openssl-0
.9.4/tools'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/space/jcs/rabah/gpkcs11-0.7.2/ceay_token/openssl-0.
9.4/tools'
if [ ! -d shlib_dir ] ; then mkdir shlib_dir ; else rm -f shlib_dir/* ; =
fi
cd shlib_dir ; ar -x ../libcrypto.a && gcc -shared ./*.o -Wl,-soname
-Wl,libcryp
to.so.0.9 \
-o ./libcrypto.so.0.9.4 && rm *.o
ld: warning: option -o appears more than once, first setting taken
ld: fatal: file libcrypto.so.0.9: cannot open file: No such file or
directory
ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to =
./libcrypto.so.0.9.4
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [shlib] Error 1
----
=20
So is the openssl build supposed to create libcrypto.so.0.9? or is these
something up with the makefile?
=20
Ideas?
Thanks!
Jonathan
=20
|
|
From: marcus b. <erw...@ho...> - 2002-11-12 16:10:37
|
My e-mail : erw...@ho... _________________________________________________________________ MSN Search, le moteur de recherche qui pense comme vous ! http://search.msn.fr/worldwide.asp |
|
From: Yosik K. <ys...@ks...> - 2002-01-15 01:00:31
|
SGVsbG8uIEV2ZXJ5b25lLg0KSSBoYXZlIGEgcXVlc3Rpb24uIEkgd2FzIGNvbXBpbGUgZ3BrY3Mx MS0wLjcuMiBvbiB3aW5kb3dzKHdpbjMyKSB1c2luZyBWQysrIDYuMC4NCkkgd2FzIGJ1aWx0IGEg Y2VheV90b2tlbixnZGJtLGxpYmdwa2NzMTEgcHJvamVjdHMuIEl0J3Mgb2suDQpJIGdlbmVyYXRl IGtleSBSU0EgMTAyNGJpdHMgdXNpbmcgdGVzdF9yc2EuYyBzYW1wbGUgY29kZS51bmZvcnR1bmF0 ZWx5LCBJIA0KZG9uJ3QgaGF2ZSBhbnkgR0RCTSBicm93c2VyLCBzbw0KSSBjb3VsZG4ndCBjaGVj ayBSU0Ega2V5IGRhdGEgaW4gR0RNIGZpbGUoYzovZ3BrY3NfZGF0YSkuDQoNCg0KcGtjczExX2Zp bmRfb2JqZWN0KCkgaXMgd29ya2luZyBnb29kLiBCdXQgQ19HZXRBdHRyaWJ1dGVWYWx1ZSBkb2Vz bid0IHdvcmtpbmcuDQpUaGlzIGNvZGUgaXMgYSBwYXJ0IG9mIG1haW4gZnVuY3Rpb24odGVzdF9z aWduLmMpIGFzIHlvdSBrbm93Lg0KDQogICAgZm9yKGs9MDsgazxwdWJfaGFuZGxlX2NvdW50OyBr KyspDQogICAgew0KICAgICAgICAuLi4uDQogICAgDQogICAgICAgIC8qIHNldCB0aGUgSUQgb2Yg dGhlIHB1YmxpYyBrZXkgaW4gdGhlIHByaXZhdGUga2V5ICovDQogICAgICAgIHJ2ID0gKHBGdW5j dGlvbkxpc3QtPkNfR2V0QXR0cmlidXRlVmFsdWUpKHNpZ25fc2VzcywgcHViX2hhbmRsZV9hcnJb a10sIA0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICZ0aGVUZW1wbGF0 ZSwgMSk7ICAgPC0tLS1IZXJlDQogICAgICAgIGlmKHJ2ICE9IENLUl9PSykNCiAgICAgICAgew0K ICAgICAgICAgICAgcHJpbnRmKCJGQUlMOiB1bmFibGUgcmVhZCBpZCBsZW5ndGggZm9yIHB1Ymxp YyBrZXkgJWxpOiANCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgMHglbHhcbiIscHViX2hhbmRsZV9hcnJb a10scnYpOw0KICAgICAgICAgICAgY29udGludWU7DQogICAgICAgIH0NCiAgICAgICAgLi4uLi4N Cg0KDQpBbmQgbmV4dCBmYWxsb3dpbmcgY29kZSBpcyBhIHBhcnQgb2Ygb2JqZWN0cy5jLg0KDQpD S19ERUZJTkVfRlVOQ1RJT04oQ0tfUlYsIENfR2V0QXR0cmlidXRlVmFsdWUpKA0KICAgQ0tfU0VT U0lPTl9IQU5ETEUgaFNlc3Npb24sDQogICBDS19PQkpFQ1RfSEFORExFIGhPYmplY3QsDQogICBD S19BVFRSSUJVVEVfUFRSIHBUZW1wbGF0ZSwNCiAgIENLX1VMT05HIHVsQ291bnQNCiAgICkNCnsN CiAgICAuLi4uDQoNCiAgICBmb3IoaT0wOyBpPHVsQ291bnQgOyBpKysscFRlbXBsYXRlKyspDQog ICAgew0KICAgIHJ2PSBDSV9UcmFuc2xhdGVBdHRyaWJ1dGUocFRlbXBsYXRlLT50eXBlLCZpYV90 eXBlKTsNCiAgICAvKiBSdWxlIDJhOiBjaGVjayB0aGF0IHRoZSBBdHRyaWJ1dGUgaXMgYSB2YWxp ZCBvbmUgYXQgYWxsICovDQogICAgaWYocnYgIT0gQ0tSX09LKQ0KICAgIHsNCiAgICAgICAgaW52 YWxpZCA9IFRSVUU7DQogICAgICAgIHJ2ID0gQ0tSX0FUVFJJQlVURV9UWVBFX0lOVkFMSUQ7DQog ICAgICAgIENJX1ZhckxvZ0VudHJ5KCJDX0dldEF0dHJpYnV0ZVZhbHVlIiwNCiAgICAgICAgIlZh bHVlIG5vdCBhIHZhbGlkIGF0dHJpYnV0ZTogMHglMDhseCIsDQogICAgICAgIHJ2LCAwLCBwVGVt cGxhdGUtPnR5cGUpOw0KICAgIH0NCiAgICBlbHNlDQogICAgew0KICAgICAgICAvKiBjaGVjayB0 aGF0IHRoZSBlbnRyeSBleGlzdHMgKi8NCiAgICAgICAgaWYoQ0lfT2JqTG9va3VwKG9iaixpYV90 eXBlKSA9PSBOVUxMX1BUUikgICAgIDwtLS0tIEhlcmUNCiAgICAgICAgew0KICAgICAgICAuLi4u DQogICAgICAgIA0KDQppYV90eXBlIGhhdmUgMTIuIGJ1dCBvYmotPmxvb2t1cFsxMl0gaXMgTlVM TC4gU28sIEkgY2FuJ3QgZG8gYW55dGhpbmcgYWZ0ZXIgDQpJIGhhdmUgYSBwcm9ibGVtLg0KSW4g b3RoZXIgd29yZHMsIEkgd2FubnQgdG86DQogMS4gR2VuZXJhdGUgUlNBIEtleSBQYWlyICAgICAg IDwtIEl0J3MgZ29vZC4gXl4NCiAyLiBTaWduICYgVmVyaWZ5ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgPC0gSXQn cyBub3QgZ29vZC4gVF9UOw0KIA0KQXJlIGdwa2NzMTEuYmFzZSBzYW1wbGUgY29kZSBnb29kIHdv cmtpbmcgPw0KRG9lcyBhbnlib2R5IGtub3cgdGhlIHJlYXNvbiBwbGVhc2UgaGVscCBtZS4NCg0K VGhhbmtzIGluIGFkdmFuY2UuLi4NCkRhcnJlbg0KDQoNCg0K |
|
From: <pa...@ya...> - 2001-11-22 09:00:37
|
Hi list members, I am working on pkcs11 for HSM by using gpkcs11 library from gpkcs.sourceforge.net and using iaik_toolkit and facing a problem to login. complete serario is I am currently not using hardware for this purpose, but using gpkcs11.dll library which is software implimentation of HSM. I initailize token with pin="password" and using same pin for login with line below myPKCS11Module_.C_Login(session_, PKCS11Constants.CKU_SO, userPin_.toCharArray()); and also seperatily with line below myPKCS11Module_.C_Login(session_, PKCS11Constants.CKU_USER, userPin_.toCharArray()); but same problem and getting error below ==> iaik.pkcs.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11Exception: CKR_PIN_INCORRECT at iaik.pkcs.pkcs11.wrapper.PKCS11Implementation.C_Login(Native Method) at SimpleTest.loginUser(SimpleTest.java:273) at SimpleTest.main(SimpleTest.java:106) <== Can u define where is problem or how I can login with which password. Thanks in advance! Faisal (pa...@ya...) --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. |