[gp32linux-devel] Re: gp32linux-devel digest, Vol 1 #2 - 2 msgs

[cyberic <cyb...@gm...>]

I think we should use uClibc, and glibc for static progs when uClibc fails.

As I said before, I tested compiling some apps with scratchbox (very
easy) and they cashed on the GP32...
New scratchbox releases are out now, so maybe we could try again...

> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:10:28 +0100 (MET)
> From: Florin Angelescu <fan...@ul...>
> To: gp3...@li...
> Subject: [gp32linux-devel] Just a thread to see who is involved in the project
> 
> scractchbox provides
> gcc toolkits uclibc or glibc
> for some applications i think we have to use glibc ... :(