Re: [gobo-eiffel-develop] defines for geant

[Andreas L. <no...@sb...>]

On Mon, 2001-10-22 at 23:44, Eric Bezault wrote:
> Andreas Leitner wrote:
> > 
> > Ok, given that -D is the more correct way to go, I'll change gexace to
> > to use that instead of --define.
> 
> But can't we support both syntax? That's what I already
> suggested for 'geant'.

Sure, thats also possible.

Btw, how can i pass options from geant to gexace currently?
I know I can nest <define> elements in <gexace> elements, but how can I
make them conditional?

The following works:
<gexace command="build" command_options="ise">
	<define name="foo1" value="bar1"/>
	<define name="foo2" value="bar2"/>
	<define name="foo3" value="bar3"/>
</gexace>

but I need some way to only define a gexace variable if the geant
variable has also been defined:
<gexace command="build" command_options="ise">
	<define name="foo1" value="${FOO1}" if="${FOO1}"/>
	<define name="foo2" value="${FOO2}" if="${FOO2}"/>
	<define name="foo3" value="${FOO3}" if="${FOO3}"/>
</gexace>

or some other way to archive a similar effect without needing to write
2^n tasks for n options.

tia,
Andreas