Re: [gobo-eiffel-develop] bridge pattern and feature comments

[Berend de B. <be...@po...>]

Andreas Leitner <no...@sb...> writes:

> On a slightly different note, I am not totally convinced anymore
> that the bridge pattern is the best solution for GOBO XML. The
> factory plus implementation plus implementations approach is simpler
> and gives you the same results with one layer of duplication less
> (the implementation interface) (If my talking was to confusing I
> mean the approach taken by eposix and the new kernel io clustern in
> gobo (et all).

On a related note: eposix will do away with the factory or phase it
out or so. This is I want to give users the ability to inherit from a
file system. This is not possible with a factory.

So you get this tree in eposix:

ABSTRACT_FILE_SYSTEM
EPX_FILE_SYSTEM (one class per windows/posix/whatever)
WINDOWS_FILE_SYSTEM/POSIX_FILE_SYSTEM/WHATEVER_FILE_SYSTEM

-- 
Groetjes,

Berend. (-: