|
From: Eric B. <er...@go...> - 2001-08-12 11:49:24
|
Christian Couder wrote: > > Would the "%R%N" be converted to a "%N" when reading the file and then > to "%R%N" again when writing the file ? Yes. As far as I know they all do that under Windows except Visual Eiffel. > If what you say is true, perhaps it could still be possible to define > the meaning of "eof" depending both on the target platform and the > compiler. > So that for example eof would always be "%N" if SmallEiffel is used, and > it would be "%N" on Unix or "%R%N" on Windows if another compiler is > used. But I don't think that it is a Gobo issue. Platform-dependent behavior should be handled by the compiler in my opinion. I don't want to have to provide different versions of the same class for the different Eiffel compilers and yet again different versions for all supported platforms. -- Eric Bezault mailto:er...@go... http://www.gobosoft.com |