From: Einar K. <eka...@cs...> - 2001-07-10 11:46:32
|
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Eric Bezault wrote: > Einar Karttunen wrote: > > > > I changed the naming to a more eiffelish format. Hope you like > > DS_LINKED_BINARY_SEARCH_TREE instead of DS_LBST. > > I sounds better indeed. But is not so nice to write... > > > > There is a 'end' missing after `set_parent'. BTW, the name > > Small eiffel doesn't complain for this, > > There was no warnings or anything like that? none. It complains that copy is deferred in DS_SPLAY_TREE but nothing else. > PS: Don't be put off by my remarks about programming styles. > I'm from a school of thoughts where it is considered that > cosmetics matters as much as functionality in reusable > library classes (see OOSC2 page 875). Sven Ehrke is already > one of my martyrs ;-) > No problem. Ny backround is in C++ and perl, which I think both are very cosmetic indeed. However I have noticed that the eiffel(ish|que) way of doing things has many advantages. I will probably next work on implementing pre/postorder cursors. - Einar Karttunen |