Re: [gobo-eiffel-develop] Class name prefixes

[Andreas L. <no...@sb...>]

On 29 May 2001 06:43:57 +0200, Christian Couder wrote:
> Eric Bezault wrote :
> > 
> > 
> > > 5. The name: I think the Gobo name is quite usefull as it is
> > >    well-known. But what about a somewhat more catchy name like Unified
> > >    Gobo? "The Unified Open Source Eiffel Library" is to formal, but
> > >    Unified Gobo sounds as somewhat more important for this large
> > >    undertaking.
> > >    But I'm also just fine with Gobo.
> > 
> > I would say the shorter the better. For example the full
> > name is actually Gobo Eiffel, but everybody just calls it
> > Gobo because it's shorter. So I would rather stick to
> > Gobo as a name, even if the documentation will clearly
> > state that it's a multi-developer multi-library project.
> 
> How about acronyms ?
> We could call it the GE for Gobo Environment or GEE for Gobo Eiffel
> Environment or even GEEK for Gobo Eiffel Environment Kernel :-)

I am not for a renaming. Let's get things done that help develop Eiffel
applications, not waste our time on renaming classes.


regards,
Andreas