From: Christian C. <chc...@cl...> - 2001-05-29 04:39:06
|
Eric Bezault wrote : > > > > 5. The name: I think the Gobo name is quite usefull as it is > > well-known. But what about a somewhat more catchy name like Unified > > Gobo? "The Unified Open Source Eiffel Library" is to formal, but > > Unified Gobo sounds as somewhat more important for this large > > undertaking. > > But I'm also just fine with Gobo. > > I would say the shorter the better. For example the full > name is actually Gobo Eiffel, but everybody just calls it > Gobo because it's shorter. So I would rather stick to > Gobo as a name, even if the documentation will clearly > state that it's a multi-developer multi-library project. How about acronyms ? We could call it the GE for Gobo Environment or GEE for Gobo Eiffel Environment or even GEEK for Gobo Eiffel Environment Kernel :-) Regards, Christian. |