From: Eric B. <er...@go...> - 2001-05-28 22:19:09
|
Berend de Boer wrote: > > But I'm not really keen on this one, I just thought it was good to be > 100% OOSC2 so people shouldn't have to rewrite, and we can't expect > that if people follow OOSC2. Make it optional at least. OK, let's make our life easier and follow OOSC2 instead of reinventing the wheel. I think that in that case if there is something optional, it should be the form not present in OOSC2 guidelines. -- Eric Bezault mailto:er...@go... http://www.gobosoft.com |