From: Colin A. <col...@go...> - 2009-05-06 17:22:55
|
Also DT_TEST_STOPWATCH.test_start_stop fails with elapsed_time_positive1 when run with: geant test_ge This is on 64-bit Linux, for what that's worth. Again, I can't see any connection with my changes to the URI classes. Shall I check-in anyway? 2009/5/6 Colin Adams <col...@go...>: > OK. > > On that basis I was prepared to check in my changes. > > But one of the tests has failed - for geant, so I guess this cannot be > something I have changed, as it will not be using the URI stuff. > > Anyway, the failing test is GEANT_FUNCTIONAL_ECHO_TEST.test_built_in_var. > The failing assertion is test_builtin_var_2 (diff between files > 'out.txt' and 'out2.txt' at line 1) > > I cannot find a file named out2.txt or out.txt. > > 2009/5/6 Eric Bezault <er...@go...>: >> Colin Adams wrote: >>> >>> One client was the test case. I've added a check statement so that it >>> should pass Void-safety. >>> >>> Geant test_debug_ge and geant test_debug_ise both pass, but I presume >>> these are NOT running in Void-safe mode. Is there a way to check that >>> what I have done is sufficient? >> >> Jocelyn might give a better answer here, but my feeling is that >> the classes are not fully void-safe yet. What is done is incremental >> modifications towards void-safety. So running in void-safe mode >> would still trigger a lot of errors I guess. >> >> -- >> Eric Bezault >> mailto:er...@go... >> http://www.gobosoft.com >> > |