From: Colin A. <col...@go...> - 2009-05-06 14:28:20
|
OK. On that basis I was prepared to check in my changes. But one of the tests has failed - for geant, so I guess this cannot be something I have changed, as it will not be using the URI stuff. Anyway, the failing test is GEANT_FUNCTIONAL_ECHO_TEST.test_built_in_var. The failing assertion is test_builtin_var_2 (diff between files 'out.txt' and 'out2.txt' at line 1) I cannot find a file named out2.txt or out.txt. 2009/5/6 Eric Bezault <er...@go...>: > Colin Adams wrote: >> >> One client was the test case. I've added a check statement so that it >> should pass Void-safety. >> >> Geant test_debug_ge and geant test_debug_ise both pass, but I presume >> these are NOT running in Void-safe mode. Is there a way to check that >> what I have done is sufficient? > > Jocelyn might give a better answer here, but my feeling is that > the classes are not fully void-safe yet. What is done is incremental > modifications towards void-safety. So running in void-safe mode > would still trigger a lot of errors I guess. > > -- > Eric Bezault > mailto:er...@go... > http://www.gobosoft.com > |