From: Bernd S. <be...@fa...> - 2008-11-27 14:30:03
|
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:44:35 +0100, Eric Bezault <er...@go...> wrote: > Bernd Schoeller wrote: >> Is there any reason why 'geant' uses ISE's 'ec' and not 'ecb' for >> compilation? 'ecb' seems is much lighter and significantly faster to >> compile code. > > The reason is that geant was implemented well before ecb was created. > This can be changed of course. But to have faster compilation I suggest > using gec ;-) I would love(!) to switch to GEC at any time, IF I the final details of GEC could be implemented (e.g. contract checking, multi-threading, internal). It is a pity that we have a very fast compiler that is 90% ready for production. (This is just to motivate you! Keep up the good work :-) ) Bernd |