From: Colin A. <col...@go...> - 2008-05-17 18:37:37
|
2008/4/29 Colin Adams <col...@go...>: > On 21/04/2008, Eric Bezault <er...@go...> wrote: > >> After looking at class UC_STRING, I'm wondering whether we should >> just adapt the routines `make_from_string' and `make_from_substring' >> so that we can pass a STRING_GENERAL. Perhaps we will have to >> rename the version of `make_from_string' inherited from STRING. >> Or add `make_from_string_general', `make_from_substring_general', >> make `make_from_substring' obsolete (make it call >> `make_from_substring_general') and modify `make_from_string' >> to call `make_from_string_general'. I'm not sure what the best >> naming convention is. > > I think the last suggestion (adding make_from_string_general and > changing make_from_string to call make_from_string_general, etc.) is > best. > Shall we do this then? I've just this minute encountered the need for it. |