From: Colin A. <col...@go...> - 2008-04-29 08:56:27
|
On 21/04/2008, Eric Bezault <er...@go...> wrote: > After looking at class UC_STRING, I'm wondering whether we should > just adapt the routines `make_from_string' and `make_from_substring' > so that we can pass a STRING_GENERAL. Perhaps we will have to > rename the version of `make_from_string' inherited from STRING. > Or add `make_from_string_general', `make_from_substring_general', > make `make_from_substring' obsolete (make it call > `make_from_substring_general') and modify `make_from_string' > to call `make_from_string_general'. I'm not sure what the best > naming convention is. I think the last suggestion (adding make_from_string_general and changing make_from_string to call make_from_string_general, etc.) is best. |