Re: [gobo-eiffel-develop] Binary search tree

[Colin A. <col...@go...>]

On 24/04/2008, Daniel Tuser <dan...@gm...> wrote:
> Colin Adams wrote:

>  I know that the indexing clause does not conform to the Gobo styling
> standards so far. And the class name should be in the same line as the class
> keyword. Those are the two non-conforming things I know. Did you find more?

There area a load of empty feature clauses and a dummy invariant in at
least one
class.

Then I dislike the absence of a blank line after create and inherit.

Also I dislike seeing local variables with names that might class with
attributes (and so forcing unnecessary renames in descendants).
I personally now write all argument names as a_*, and all local names
as either a single chanaracter or l_*. I am converting my existing
code on a piecemeal basis.