Re: [gobo-eiffel-develop] Binary search tree

[Colin A. <col...@go...>]

On 24/04/2008, Daniel Tuser <dan...@gm...> wrote:


> > Some of the routines are too long to read on the screen.
> >
> >
>  I don't like that as well. Those are the algorithms that could also be
> implemented as recursive features. I will see what I can do to improve that.
> But I will not make them recursive.
>  A splitting into more features is also not easy as some features would
> require about 4 or 5 arguments. I was already working on that but stopped
> because the resulting code was not more readable. It could be done using
> attributes. But it would take some time.

>  Do you think that has to be changed?

I would say yes, provided there is no significant performance impact.

I don't think passing 5 arguments is a reason not to do it, as the
routines receiving 5 arguments are all secret.