Re: [gobo-eiffel-develop] Memory allocation overhead

[Eric B. <er...@go...>]

Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> I would expect this to be a no-op. Is it not a call that provides
> typing information only to the compiler, so that at run-time there is
> not need for it?

As I claimed many times in the past, no effort has been
made yet to improve the performance of the generated C
code. IN particular in term of inlining or dynamic
binding.

My priority is to be fully compliant with ECMA and ISE
before tackling performance issues. And from what I can
see, spending time on this issue now will not significantly
improve your figures as long as most of the time is still
spent in the GC.

-- 
Eric Bezault
mailto:er...@go...
http://www.gobosoft.com