Re: [gobo-eiffel-develop] geant: notion of local variables

[Sven E. <sve...@we...>]

Jocelyn wrote:
> I first did that, adding a field  {GEANT_TARGET}.locals: GEANT_VARIABLES
> but this doesn't work, since GEANT_TARGET holds static data, when we 
> need execution data.
> 
> I mean, if you call recursively the same target, then you'll have the 
> locals messed up, since you share the same list of locals for the 2 
> executions of the same target.
> Do you see what I mean ?

Right. Now I remember that I had the same issue when I implemented argument support.
Somehow I had the feeling that a new target object is created when <geant> calls
a target which is not the case and this causes the problem.

> In fact, what would be nicer is to have a GEANT_TARGET_STACK .. which 
> would hold the arguments, and locals stacks.

I agree.

- Sven