From: Colin A. <col...@go...> - 2007-11-01 10:12:48
|
It's up to you. 6155 has fewer bugs. I shall continue to work on the code base at 6155, and correct the bugs as I find them (I'll check this one at the weekend). So please don't revert the trunk, as otherwise I shall get in a mess again. (A warning to others - this is how I think I got into the mess - I was creating some new classes, but then I decided they were in the wrong clusters - so as I had already issued svn add command, I issued svn mv commands to move them to the correct clusters. Which was fine until I tried to update or commit - then svn kept saying it couldn't issue an add as it was already added. The only way I could make progress was by doing an svn rm --force, whilst keeping a copy of the class in my Emacs buffer, and promptly adding it again - but there were a number of classes involved, and I missed one. In future, I am going to make it a rule to only move classes when the commit will consist of nothing but class moves). As for the SE 1.2r7 issue, I had tested this sort of thing before (I have removed it elsewhere). I didn't specifically test against SE on Monday morning as I had no time. On 01/11/2007, Eric Bezault <er...@go...> wrote: > Eric Bezault wrote: > > Colin Adams wrote: > >> Note that this is in the area of the class that I had to reconstruct > >> by hand on Monday morning. I THINK I only re-ran the tests with gec > >> that morning. > > > > OK, I managed to restore version 6152, which is the one that has > > been accidentally removed at version 6153. Can I use it instead of > > the one that you reconstructed by hand at version 6155? > > At least, the test passes now. > > -- > Eric Bezault > mailto:er...@go... > http://www.gobosoft.com > |