[gobo-eiffel-develop] AP_STRING_LIST_OPTION?

[Colin A. <col...@ho...>]

I am in the process of making the XSLT serializer a separate component (alt=
hough still dependent on the xslt library.xace) , so that other programs ca=
n make use of the various serialization options offered by XSLT (see http:/=
/www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#element-output).

Although this isn't quite finished yet, I am writing an example program ill=
ustrating its usage (it will take an xml file name plus a series of command=
-line arguments specifying serialization options). naturally I am using the=
 arguments library.

Now the xsl:output attribute cdata-section-elements takes a list of qnames.=
 The natural way to specify this in the example program is:

--cdata-section-elements=3D(qname1,qname2,qname3)

I can do this with an AP_STRING_OPTION and parse the resulting string, but =
it seems to me it is a reusable pattern and it looks worth creating a class=
 AP_STRING_OPTION_LIST.

Do people agree?

_________________________________________________________________
Celeb spotting =96 Play CelebMashup and win cool prizes
https://www.celebmashup.com=