Re: [gobo-eiffel-develop] ET_FEATURE.set_feature_clause

[Howard T. <how...@di...>]

Ah yes, of course .... I hadn't noticed that class.

Thanks.

On Wednesday 22 August 2007 13:53, you wrote:
> Howard Thomson wrote:
> > The problem with ET_AST_ITERATOR.process_features was that the
> > feature_clause attribute was Void for the queries and procedures being
> > processed and therefore not matching the current feature_clause.
> >
> > In the parsing process, the current feature is passed as an argument to
> > the new_do_procedure / new_do_function etc routines in ET_AST_FACTORY but
> > are not used in those routines to do set_feature_clause for that
> > argument.
> >
> > Having added Result.set_feature_clause to the relevant 8 routines of
> > ET_AST_FACTORY, I am now getting features processed.
>
> You should not do that, but use ET_DECORATED_AST_FACTORY instead.
> This is what is done in $GOBO/test/tools and in
> $GOBO/example/tools/bang2create.

-- 
Howard Thomson

--
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity,
and I'm not sure about the former." -- Albert Einstein