Re: [gobo-eiffel-develop] Introspection, persistence, debugger

[Eric B. <er...@go...>]

Wolfgang Jansen wrote:
> Eric Bezault wrote:
>> For the sake of interoperability, I think that the gap to be closed
>> in terms of introspection should be addressed by ECMA and FreeELKS
>> first. So I would suggest that you submit your introspection library
>> interface to FreeELKS so that all compilers supporting FreeELKS can
>> agree to support it. Then we can safely integrate it to gec without
>> breaking interoperability.
>>
> Well, that's an idea. But don't believe that standardizing consorts
> are interested: the stuff provides an implementation of
> introspection etc. but no new concept.

Standardization does not mean finding new concepts but agreeing
on something that everyone should follow, even if that something
already exists.

Do you want me to send a message to the FreeELKS mailing list to
see if people involved in FreeELKS are interested in a standardized
form of introspection and if yes, if your solution could be
acceptable by everyone?

-- 
Eric Bezault
mailto:er...@go...
http://www.gobosoft.com