From: Wolfgang J. <wj...@so...> - 2007-07-17 15:39:37
|
Eric Bezault wrote: > I don't like warnings when the code is valid. > But I agree that sometimes it will be useful to have this > information as warning when the Eiffel code is really at fault. > This was my intension. I did not expect that the compiler looks across routine boundaries. I agree that in this case a warning in one class because of a void reference in another class is very misleading. > > BTW, what is 'icc'? Is it the same as what I found on wikipedia: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_C%2B%2B_Compiler > Yes. Sometimes a friend gives me the access to a platform where "icc" runs. My impression is that the compiler is better that "cc" which in turn is much better than "gcc". In other words, if a user of "gec" works on a platform supporting "icc" then it is highly probable that he wants to use the "icc" in connection with "gec". PS The attachment contains the binaries of "gec", ... to be added to http://www.gobosoft.com/eiffel/gobo/gec/platforms.html Except for "gec", I did not test staff. Computer: alpha OS: OSF1 V5.1 CC: Compaq C V6.4 others: 64 bit, little endian, Tru64 -- Wolfgang Jansen University of Potsdam, Germany mailto: wj...@so... |