From: Eric B. <er...@go...> - 2007-02-22 14:16:12
|
Jocelyn wrote: > For now, I made the GEANT_GROUP_TASK and GEANT_GROUP_COMMAND. > So this is a basic geant task, which can be used as any task. > It doesn't have any extra semantic appart from being a tasks containing > a sequential group of tasks. > > The schema should looks like > <define name="group"> > <element name="group"> > <ref name="dir_if_unless"/> > <optional> > <attribute name="name"/> > </optional> > <ref name="tasks"/> > </element> > </define> > > so a group can include another group and so on, as the example in my > previous post. > Does it answer the question ? Yes, but it's more restrictive than I thought. It would be great if there was a mean to use groups as a kind of parentheses to group any kind of elements. Now that <group> is used to group tasks, will it be possible to use it later on to group other kinds of elements? Or will we be out of luck because <group> is already used for tasks? -- Eric Bezault mailto:er...@go... http://www.gobosoft.com |