From: Franck A. <fr...@ne...> - 2007-02-11 21:54:27
|
> For XML 1.1, the equivalent to \c is 3830417 bytes long. > > This is definitely too big, so something is wrong with the test > program. Can anyone see where the fault is (I know it's not the most > efficient way of doing it): it should get (much?) more compact by collapsing adjacent ranges into forms "\x\y[\z1-\z2]" or "\x\y." (example for 3 byte utf8 sequences.) perhaps not to usable level for repetitive use of \c. maybe with a 'let' construct? |